Losing a vital plane now when you are at war then it doesn’t really matter if it might get replaced sometime far in the future

You don’t have to be a tankie or a wankie to recognize the fact that a loss ratio of 0% is very good for an aircraft.

If it was a Russian or Chinese aircraft doing this then that would also be a fact.

It’s stupid to say that a single aircraft being damaged makes the entire type worthless like many here are saying when the F-35 is the only aircraft flying these missions and come back with only damage to a single plane.

That is not a political statement or approval of the strikes. That’s just a statement on the plane.

For the all the probably hundreds of sorties flown with a result of zero losses and only a single aircraft being damaged they might aswell be invisible.

Why does it matter what is replaced?

I would say if it frees up a human from having to do it that it’s good news.

“must benefit everyone, not just a handful of billionaires”

It’s hard to disagree with that statement but all this upheaval about “killing jobs” seems really pointless to me.

A manual farm has far more employees then one that uses modern machinery, is the economy in decline if the farmer replaces human labor with machines?

Good stuff, Ukraine has proven again that having a nuclear arsenal is really the only way to ensure a country’s security when faced wirh a hostile nuclear armed neighbor.

If there is a way to combine this with something like anubis this could be very interesting, then you are also not dependent on the honesty of reading the robots.txt

Have a RSL license? here you go scrape the content.

Trying to freeload? anubis time.

Having something to talk to is a massive improvement over bottling it all up.

AI is very beneficial to people who can’t afford the cost or are otherwise unable/unwilling to speak with a professional.

How is this not a “won’t somebody please think of the children” thing?

Yes it is terrible this has happend, but there is a way to prevent children from accessing AI and its called parenting.

Kids shouldn’t be using AI if it harms them, kids can’t make this choice so it should be made for them. Same with alcohol, same with porn, same with the other things restricted to children.

But that doesn’t mean responsible adults shouldn’t be able to use it, but “won’t somebody please think of the children” litigation will make that impossible.

I don’t care if openai lose all their money but this ruling would also effect open source AI.

If somebody releases a AI why would they be liable for how people decide to use it? Its software and like any other program its the user’s choice on how to use it.

If i decide to run rm / --no-preserve-root is gnu then responsible to fix it?

AI is already very censored, and if makers become liable for what people do with their AI they will become hyper censored and performance will go down the drain.

Hitler sues Mussolini