It was meant to be in the courts, civil and criminal, and in the most outlandish cases, the FBI and ICC.
But…that’s not where we’re at. So we have to decide what a new world looks like without these systems to protect us from the system itself.
NEVER stop talking about this. Every time he has a press conference, ask him about it.
You mean you wish they made up insane stories from absolute fantasy to make the standard of goodness fluctuate with their whims? I dunno…
Kinda hard when they’ve gone full mafioso and split up the country into territories so that we only have like one choice and have to be a customer. Because capitalism runs on no competition and monopolies, right?
Tell me about it.
Ugh.
Demand better discourse then. Because bad discourse don’t lead to positive change
No im not. You’re just seeing the issue-as-it-is as binary. I’m saying it’s bad to ignore all context to make a cheap point, even if your point is good. There are a billion ways to make a good point. Why choose a bad one.
DONT BRING NUANCE AND LOGIC TO A SENSELESS FEELINGS-BAITING POST! It doesn’t MATTER the city layout over top of it, the context of rapid and rampant industrialization in China, or something as inconsequential as number of people!
That tiered system is fucking absurd. Ad supported, ad supported plus, “premium” and “premium plus”—WHICH STILL HAS ADS.
What in the fuck. Who in their right mind is paying for that?
Of course they do
Man those were simpler times—kinda. But the tea party era led us directly to where we are now
I hope you returned that shit. That’s not mildly infuriating, that’s capitalism has officially run amok and needs to be taken out back and shot in the head
Spontaneously composting.
Bam you’re fertile dirt.
They’re not miserable. They are fascists. Can’t wait for the crowdsourced Nuremberg/french revolution mashup (2027 remaster)
Exactly. He’s even trying empathy and basic humanity as means to change the topic