Stupid fucking question. Next!

This replay is the funniest shit lmao. Keep building that bridge Claude.

https://arcprize.org/replay/0964128b-a2f5-4c5b-886e-497d893f429d

Interesting that it seems to be perceiving the environment mostly accurately, and is just completely wrong about the purpose of all the game objects.

Just build Electron native or something, christ.

The idea is that if there were appropriate checks on his power, he wouldn’t have attacked Iran. So the former is a mechanism to achieve the latter. This article is part of a larger system of signalling mechanisms that previously worked to reduce the number of countries blown up by the US, but which is collapsing in light of deteriorating socio-material conditions.

@Grok@twitter.com is this true?

vibeslop type comment bruh

The AI was asked the same question repeatedly and gave different answers, due to its randomised structure.

People will also often do this (I have, personally), but because our actions seem to be strongly influenced by time-dependent stuff (like sense perception and short-term memory contents), I’d expect you’d need to ask at different times.

Wow you must have done some really extensive probing of the models to say that with such confidence. When can we expect the paper?

Same takeaway as the article (everyone read the article, right?).

Applying it to yourself, can you recall instances when you were asked the same question at different points in time? How did you respond?

Yeah I was there. He ate all the Epstein files then ate his whole body so there’s no eveidence. Stop asking.

Hurray! The GDP is saved!

Look, that ledge has yellow paint. I bet I can climb it.

In your example where the money is literally taken & handed out, it’d result in short-term price surges, and probably have very little re-distributive effect (the money would end up flowing back up rapidly, and flow back down at the same rate as before).

But that’s not the only possibility. It should be possible to perform land & capital reform: altering the ownership & organisational structure of companies, causing them to allocate resources differently, causing the prices of goods (and of labour) to change relative to each other, and this can increase equality & overall standards of living. For instance, elite populations tend to hoard land & buildings, leaving them idle to fulfil their higher-level psychological needs (i.e. a big private estate) whereas that land could house a factory that contributes to lowering the prices of goods (or, I’m sure you can think of some other uses). They also tend to order the overproduction of prestige goods, when the effort that went into producing those could have went into producing goods that more effectively increase living standards. The relative price of bread & champagne isn’t fixed and when the gap is small, it contributes to inequality, but measuring how much is difficult.

Of course, actually figuring out how to do this is the hard part, but it has been done historically. Usually, the longer it lies, the bolder elites get with misallocations of capital, and the easier it is to come up with good suggestions. You are here (cough, datacenters, cough).

You think North Korea is capitalist?? How.

MFW the police defund themselves.

Dumbass shipping route, just tunnel through.

This is the type of shit a noob does in Victoria 3. Uooueggh line is going down start slapping buttons!!!

NO, YOU ARE WRONG!

They’ve been quite clear.