Reading through the bill, they use the term “biological sex” without defining it

What amateurs are writing these laws? Not even defining terms? I get the vagueness of it is the point, but there are a lot of edge cases that will be in limbo from this

So many headlines over the past year are things I remember seeing out of China and Russia over the past decade

Russian politicians claim the same thing about gays. I believe it was in Chechnya

Because that was the deal to be allowed to invest that money without paying taxes

The goal, at a societal level, is the incentivize keeping it in a retirement fund

You can always pay yaxes and invest the money in a brokerage account if you don’t want to risk penalties

I had a similar account that got banned for connecting to the wrong VPN endpoint. Clicked a random server from my VPN provider, suddenly my account was permanently banned with no ability to appeal

Thinking it was just some issue on my end (it was a non-standard looking ban), I logged into another OG account of mine, which also promptly got perma-banned

Extreme incompetence for them to be issuing perma-bans like that based on IP address

They made it easier for bots to thrive by allowing hidden post histories, limiting the API, and punishing users for “bad” reports, but claim they need face ID to filter out bots?

You could have read the article instead of being insulting to a recently deceased man:

He “passed away peacefully after a long battle with cancer,” OnlyFans confirmed in a statement, which asked for privacy for his family.

Polymarket and Kalshi are going to start hiding account histories because of these stories, aren’t they?

with a few bursts of up to 150Km/h to get away from idiots doing 80 on a 100 (or just to show off the torque to other types of idiots like BMW and some Tesla drivers 😏)

Yeah, they’re the idiots. Not the one going 50 over while showing off…

Judges do have public contact information (here is this judge’s: https://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/judges-info/district-court-judges/joseph-r-goodwin), but judges are not public representatives. They don’t (directly) answer to the people. There are also a lot of laws protecting the judicial process

They’re not doing anything. They’re merely saying they could do something in the future

Don’t listen to what people say, watch what they do

If the judges handing out these warnings agreed with the illegal detentions, but didn’t want to explicitly break the law themselves, what would they do differently? I don’t think anything. If they wanted these illegal detentions to happen, while still covering their own ass, they’d do exactly this: Drag their feet on doing any action, while verbally condemning the government breaking the law

User submissions. There’s a leaderboard and people are crazy fast at submitting them. I’ve seen 30 minute videos have the sponsor sections blocked out within 10 minutes of being posted

As an example, here are the stats for my sponsor block:

You’ve saved people from 3,297 segments ( 2d 17h 7.0 minutes of their lives )

You’ve skipped 577 segments ( 10h 18.6 minutes )

Project Farm is the only channel I can think of where I’d trust the review to be fair and honest

The psychology of those incels would be fascinating to study

They enjoy insulting and humiliating these women for doing sex work, then they go ahead and pay for it

Granted that’s been the history of sex work for thousands of years, this is just one of the most direct examples of it. Wonder if it boils down to them wanting to project their own shame and guilt on the women

The hacker left behind traces of his activity. His IP address was logged at the proxy he used, CTunnel.com, and he also left his email address while posting to 4chan. Furthermore, the attacker revealed the original web address used by the proxy

There were at least 3 easy ways to track him. Dude really sucked at covering his tracks

Jeffrey is hers, she gets what she wants.

1. She’s still in prison, so even if Epstein is alive somewhere, she hasn’t gotten him

2. Epstein would hold as much, or more, blackmail than her

3. If she held that level of power, she would be out of prison herself

What’s keeping Ghislaine in a vacation prison where she gets her own dog, and the warden her bitch?

There is no way she could die without the public overwhelmingly being angry about the situation, after what happened to Epstein. Therefore the best course for those in power is to placate her and give her the best conditions possible in exchange for her giving false testimony absolving them

What’s keeping all the American billionaires in the Epstein Files free from accountability?

The fact they’re in power and able to quash investigations, and the public is generally too distracted by divisive politics like race and gender identity

Don’t give up understanding it so easily. You can make sense of it when you consider the motivations and limitations of the players involved

The only links in the descriptions for those videos are for Dr. G’s course, which isn’t a good look

While his sources lack credibility, dismissing every substack as a “nazi news platform” is disingenuous

His original twitter password was, “yourefired”, which was found because it was his LinkedIn password during the breach a few years prior

Darknet Diaries has an episode about it: https://darknetdiaries.com/transcript/87/

I’m sure it was possible to swap Epstein out. I just don’t think there was the motivation for it

No one wants Epstein alive. The rich and powerful want to bury their crimes, normal people want retribution. The only motivator I can imagine would be a deadman switch, but even if Epstein were smuggled out, the rich and powerful would have dismantled any blackmail Epstein had by now and finished the job

I see no path that still has Epstein alive at this point