It’s given me an idea of how we get there. Clearly, modern LLMs aren’t near the level as seen in movies, but we will get there. We will move on from LLMs within a few years to a more adaptive model, as we further increase our understanding of AI and neural networks.

I see modern LLMs as task tools, they can interpret our requests to pass onto a more intelligent model type which will save processing power needed from the newer AIs.

People in this thread seem to have a lot of bias, they can’t see how the tech will evolve. You need to keep an open mind and look at where tech is being developed, with AI, it will be new architectures.

You got this!

Sounds like an issue with your network or routes. By design, WG is faster.

Please get some rest. You’re oddly irritable and delusional and it can’t be healthy.

You make weird assumptions seemingly based on outdated ideas. I’ll let you be, perhaps you need some rest.

You are misunderstanding the tech. That’s not how this works, models are trained often, did you think this was done only a few years ago? The fact that you called them bots says everything.

You’re just hating to hate on something, without understanding the technology. The efficiency I’m referring to is the MoE architecture that only got popular within the last year. There are still new architectures being developed, not that you care about this topic but would prefer to blindly hate on what’s spewed from outdated and biased news sources.

As with almost all technology, AI tech is evolving into different architectures that aren’t wasteful at all. There are now powerful models we can run that don’t even require a GPU, which is where most of that power was needed.

The one wrong thing with your take is the lack of vision as to how technology changes and evolves over time. We had computers the size of rooms to run processes that our mobile phones can now run hundreds of times more efficiently and powerfully.

Your other points are valid, people don’t realize how AI will change the world. They don’t realize how soon people will stop thinking for themselves in a lot of ways. We already see how critical thinking drops with lots of AI usage, and big tech is only thinking of how to replace their staff with it and keep consumers engaged with it.

Then how can you say mental health is “one of the most neglected forms of care”, then go on to neglect the mental health concerns brought up by the article by minimizing it to a single comparison made in the first paragraph?

We can all agree that content moderation is incredibly harmful, and if we want to support mental health care, that should be the focus of discussion.

That’s a fair opinion. I could never imagine contracting someone to put content on my website, then making my end users pay to even see that content just so I can ensure I can pay my writers, knowing it drives most traffic away. An ethical and intelligent website host would ensure more consistent and effective ways of bringing in income, which is their responsibility.

We live in a digital age where most of everything on the internet is free. Putting your site behind a paywall is a surefire way to ensure your website will receive less traffic in this day and age, but to each to their own.

Tons of ways, the most common is ads and partner affiliates.

That’s not the responsibility of the end user. That’s the responsibility of the host. If you’re going to have people write your articles, pay them.

Years? Yeah that’ll be the end of this year, at most.