Guys you heard it here first: You can drink alcohol for 16 hours everyday and it’s not addiction.

My problem is that waste being unborn next generation’s problem. Who are we to demand them to keep guarding our shit? With fusion, the waste is the alive-generation’s problem.

Fission has the “long (1+ centuries) term storage solution of the byproducts” problem (output is dirty and long lasting). Fusion has no such big problem (output is dirty and short lasting).

I like hyperboles so here: If everyone did fission in their backyard, we’d have a big and long lasting problem. If everyone did fusion in their backyard, we’d have a medium and short lasting problem.

deleted by creator

The games we play are that easy though. Dark souls with eyes = hard, dark souls to an entity which has no eyes, but can read RAM states = easy.

Most singleplayer games (so the opponents are clockwork) are easy to enough to play with heuristics, why do we need a whole ass neural network?

They stopped her there (obstruction of the road, the given reason). They were the reason her voice was heard in that second and not later, and lead to the arrest (the real reason).

Is this really your point or are you being sarcastic? Pick one

but that makes the system confidently wrong, not hardworking.

Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.

Free software doesn’t count :p

I block people if they needlesly use a brand name isntead of saying the group name. Do I probably have some false positives? Probably.

As long as they can reduce the adblock usage, it is a win for them. 100% success is not the goal. Right now there is nothing stopping everyone from using some sort of adblocker (0% revenue is possible actually), which must be scary.

You can keep it optimally dirty to avoid some insects (the ones who avoid mammallian products) and only deal with the ones which seek human smells/other molecules.

It is, did I write something wrong which negates that?

How can you know a game is LGBTQ+ if they don’t talk about sex/gender? They look like normal humans to me, which differ in sexual preferences only? Example: How can you say this guy is gay without knowing his sexual preferences?

What if content amount is the problem and old search algorithms simply do not scale well? (Pagerank algorithm has bunch of assumptions, are they still true/good enough?)

You do know that -gamy means marriage right? We aren’t talking about polyamory, we are talking about polygamy.

I don’t think western governments allow polygamous marriages. Or do you mean only dating and never having legal rights?

1/e is about 37%, maybe 1-1/e?

You went back to the banking industry and you report this event as a good thing?