It’s dishonest because that was not what was said. The wording was “parade full of civilians”. This is a military parade with most likely zero civilian participants, albeit there are civilians watching it.
For reference, parade full of civilians:
Not a parade full of civilians:
Notice the difference?
Nah, I think this is just showing middle finger to Putin. Reflecting a desire to show who really decides if there is to be a parade in Moscow.
I mean a strike would probably be very unlikely anyway. The reason it’s been said out loud is far more interesting.
Consensus among international human rights organizations seems to be that Ukrainian strikes on Russia have been limited in scope and while they have certainly caused civilian harm, Ukraine isn’t known to directly target Russian citizens. Russia on the other hand is systematically and directly targetting Ukrainian citizens and strikes on Ukraine have caused significantly higher civilian casualties.
Also worth noting is that it is a military parade, albeit with civilians following it. Masking it as “a parade full of civilians celebrating the defeat of fascism” is dishonest. In reality it’s a pompous display of killing tools. I guess it needed to be said that this particular military parade will not be attacked.
As a native finn I agree. So much noise and so many impractical solutions for something that we have for all intents and purposes solved millenia ago.
Yeah like Florence Foster Jenkins came pretty close to hitting the right notes almost every time…
–Edit–
typo
Half the finns don’t even use “hän”. In day to day conversations it’s frequently replaced with “se” which is basically “it”, making no difference between living things and inanimate objects. That is not considered impolite or anything like that. It’s more a dialect thing.
You did not “make it accurate”, you simply twisted my words based on your own imagination. Unless you’re willing to behave like an actual adult, I have nothing more to say to you.