I appreciate the comprehensive take. So tired of people claiming to know which sources are biased and which aren’t, acting as though they are somehow immune to it while everyone who disagrees with them is subject to it. And you are right, there is no great solution except that news needs to be as decentralized as possible, from many independent sources.

Probably Christianity

Has anyone recommended therapy for Iran’s leaders? Maybe that would stop them from violently oppressing their people, since War obviously isn’t working.

Yes but it’s still weird going to bat for Iran, an objectively worse country in every way. The blood of thousands of their own citizens spilled at their own hand hasn’t even cooled yet, and somehow people are making them out to be the good guys.

Ok good that’s what I thought

When is it propaganda and when isn’t it?

“Affair”

Oh I thought you were saying that’s why Wendy’s was going out of business, because they didn’t pay their workers enough.

Eliminating opposition is an even simpler fix. It’s unlikely and it should be unlikely because that’s a dangerous road to go down.

How did stagnated wages hurt their sales?

Good thing they aren’t the final arbiter of truth, the all knowing, omniscient, all powerful enforcer of that which is true and just. But you aren’t either, so its good that you also don’t have that power.

Voter ID is a weird hill to die on. Most of the world requires it, for obvious reasons. It really shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

This is why i don’t buy the conspiracy that he is still alive. I can’t imagine what the powers that be would have to gain by letting him live. He’s much too dangerous.

You shouldn’t need a discriminatory law to allow it. Your resume speaks for itself. It might feel good to do something like this, but it’s flawed from the start and we shouldn’t start down that path.

Well you have to convict them first

Not to be that guy, but I can’t see this ever holding up or getting approved in the first place. As of now there is no way to discriminate based on previous occupation. The only legal grounds for job discrimination currently in California is based on being a sexual predator or violent felon. Even regular felons are allowed to be teachers. Not sure it’s a good idea to go down the path of allowing job discrimination based on what your previous job was, particularly when it’s a completely legal occupation.

The paradox of intolerance is the one that’s been getting to me lately. People forgot that its a paradox and think it’s justification for them to attack people they disagree with.

Yeah that’s one criteria for selective enforcement, but lately it’s also been happening along political party lines.

Like immigration laws? There has always been selective enforcement.

Democrats have more to gain from ICE shooting people than Trump does.