LordMayor

Fucking delusional. I’m betting their “AI” will never live up to the promises, good or bad.

It’s all hype to keep investors pouring in money in the hopes that the endless stream of money can fund the development of what they promise and tell us to fear.

It’s a classic scam. “Big return, we promise. We’ll strike oil soon, we just need more money.”

No, they’re a nonprofit that provides legal support to open source projects.

Written by a company, Funambol.

Approved as open source by the Open Source Initiative.

Published by the Free Software Foundation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License#

Not these clippers, either:

• .slop
• .clancker
• .gooner
• .moe

Fuck it, just give them their own space.

You don’t have to read or comment on every post, you numpty, Just ignore it, block it or move on.

There are people that suffer from isolation, anxiety, depression, trauma or a host of other issues over which they have no control or support structures to address their problems. Of course, these bots aren’t a solution but they are accessible. It’s no wonder why people would use them.

They deserve sympathy not condescension.

Uhm, no.

This is one of those technologies that CEOs hear about and think would be great for their business. But, they don’t consider that nobody wants to fucking do this.

It’s not supernatural, it’s philosophical.

What’s the difference?

Are you serious? Honestly, you’re not worth talking to if you have to ask that.

It’s not supernatural, it’s philosophical.

And it’s the foundation for most, if not all, liberal democracies.

Rights don’t come from government or god. The USA based their form of government on the idea of “natural rights.” These rights are inherent in human beings. They are the default.

We give the government the power to restrict those rights in order for everyone to get along and thrive. The government does not grant rights. We let the government restrict or strip those rights under certain circumstances.

I’ve never heard of progressivism denying natural rights.

He’s trying to put religion above the State. The State, in a democracy, is the people. Fucker wants a theocracy.

1. Integrate AI into the OS
2. Demand purchase of a Windows license for the AI in the OS
3. GOTO 2

It’s an infinite amount of money from every customer!

Come on people. Is this what we’ve devolved to? First, you throw a rock to break a window then you throw the Molotov inside the house.

The patents have expired everywhere except USA, Brazil and Malaysia.

This is a blatant money grab before they expire everywhere.

You have to understand that there are places in the USA where “city planning” is completely unheard of. They seem to let landowners develop however the fuck they want. They end up with grids of identical houses with little thought of connections to services such as shopping, healthcare, recreation, etc.

So, telling someone they aren’t who/what they think they are is ok? Not just telling them but pushing a program of persuasion to change their mind.

They’re going to overturn hate speech laws next. And all advertising restrictions.

Someone needs to start a trans conversion therapy program that tries to make people trans. See how fast that gets banned.

The people I know that use BlueSky just wanted Twitter without Musk. It wasn’t much more complicated than that and BlueSky has provided that.

Adding AI is very Musk-like so I’m not surprised there’s backlash.

I’d rather see a 1000 individual cases than a class action. It would probably be more expensive for Meta to fight and lose individual cases all across the world.

It’s not insolvent. The treasury didn’t say it was insolvent. It’s a consecutive org pushing a “balanced budget amendment”.

You fell for their propaganda.

But, they’re (two authors) also wrong. The US is not insolvent. The treasury report did not say It was insolvent. For a country to be insolvent it would have to be unable or unwilling to pay its debts.

The article relies on readers not understanding how government financials work. They use a household metaphor which is completely irrelevant.

The article is propaganda pushing the “we need balanced budget” narrative which is a ridiculous way to run a government.

No one said being wasteful is a good thing. This article is not about how much or where money should be spent. They want to push a narrative that the government spends more than it can afford. This is false.

The real aim is to limit government spending on entitlements, social programs, arts, sciences, etc.