Any reason this wouldn’t work with cell towers?

Do you honestly not see the difference between these two? Deleting a couple lines of code or a file is just not the same as adding a feature to a codebase.

I think it’s fine as is. The worst part of reddit was opening an interesting post and finding the comments full of jokes and badly remembered quotes.

Edit: That was probably due to the awards creating perverse incentives but still, the more comments there are the more striking a comment needs to be to be on top

AMD Ryzen CPUs have reportedly seen over a 50% price increase in Japan, likely due to AI.

… CPU prices could reportedly increase as software developers shift toward running cloud-based AI-related applications locally.

Who tf is running ai models on cpus? The source seems to be a Chinese report by intel:

… The goal was to achieve a cumulative price increase of 30% based on 2025 prices, thereby recovering the investment in capacity expansion and meeting the return expectations of the capital market and investors…

… some users, especially software developers, are choosing to deploy AI-related applications locally, thus creating strong demand for AI PCs … The core growth is concentrated in the high-end thin and light laptop and thin and light gaming laptop user groups…

So the reason AMD’s desktop cpus suddenly got more expensive in Japan is because Intel is expecting an increase in ultrabook sales? I’m unsatisfied

I think this is about when you browse more than anything else. A significant portion of posts on Lemmy are posted by serial posters. If you don’t browse when they post their stuff, you could think it’s all us news bots

Waiting for some genius to calculate how many people this statistically means

Couldn’t they just implement id verification without a requirement from the law? That way they wouldn’t need to wait for the governments to one by one pass laws

It still has idiosyncrasies that create friction. Looking like it’s from early 2000s is much less of a problem imo than confusing buttons and unintuitive workflows. E: It’s also strangely laggy and multimonitor support on wayland is still not fixed

Holy shit wow

Am I not allowed to be infuriated on the mildly infuriating community? I don’t care why it was put in there or if they’re going to remove it after seeing this post. I’m here to vent because I find it scammy to force this on every player (most of which didn’t even play multiplayer) despite not even listing it on the store page like they’re supposed to.

I was going to say they should go porcelain if it’s in location but I guess they don’t trust kids with them. Can’t stop thinking of microplastics tho

I was today years old when I learned Doom has a multiplayer… I doubt many people buy this for its multiplayer. They could selectively ask those who click on the multiplayer if that was their concern.

Looking at achievement stats, 32% of people finished the campaign while 12% of people won a multiplayer match. So I’m not alone in thinking of Doom as a single player game

Probably bought this as part of a bundle a long time ago. And I don’t feel like spending time pirating it while it’s already installed

I tried reading them and it didn’t even scroll to show the rest.

wdym reusable? You take it back to the restaurant next time you go? You eat in and they collect it after you leave?

What made you think I was proposing a scheme compliant with the bill? I repeatedly said that this would be to prevent such a bill from passing. And explained my reasoning why it would do so.

To make it doubly clear: I don’t support what they’re trying to do. I just think it could do us good to ourselves address any legitimate concerns they use as excuses to implement surveillance so it’s harder to use them as excuses.

As far as I know self regulation by media industries implementing age labels prevented these kinds of “think of the children” bills before. No idea where you got the corporations having private information from, the entire idea is that it would be open source so we can know that it’s not doing anything shady.

Politicians pushing for these bills don’t care about the excuse they present, but the reason they can repeatedly use the same excuse is because it is a legitimate concern for people. I don’t think digging our heels in to refuse a solution even if it were to align with our stated principle of preserving privacy helps us in the public consciousness.

even worse invasions of privacy

“worse” isn’t accurate as the entire point is that it would be designed to be non-invasive (for people who don’t have csam anyways). Of course they’ll keep trying to invade our privacy but with the example of a solution that doesn’t use mass surveillance for something they tried to push surveillance for, they’ll have less leg to stand on.

To be fair, the 10k is just a sample. The true amount is 86 million, about a quarter of all Spotify songs.

Put another way, for any random song a person listens to, there is a 99.6% likelihood that it is part of the archive. We expect this number to be higher if you filter to only human-created songs. Do remember though that the error bar on listens for popularity 0 is large.

For popularity=0, we ordered tracks by a secondary importance metric based on artist followers and album popularity, and fetched in descending order.

We have stopped here due to the long tail end with diminishing returns (700TB+ additional storage for minor benefit), as well as the bad quality of songs with popularity=0 (many AI generated, hard to filter).

Also it sounds like they had difficulty scraping some of the less popular songs and got them from somewhere else.

Can we take an ‘industry regulates itself’ approach to this? Make a foss csam hash scanner and include it in aosp. When they try to pass these show them that it already exists. That way we at least have some transparency to what it does

Fake blogs scraped from Reddit used to be fairly common and they weren’t even exclusive to product reviews. Although it is surprising you found one that’s still up, I’d assumed they would die off after the api purge.