It really is. Slippery slope fallacy. Letting one neighborhood collectively decide to make an intersection by a park safer for children to cross is not the same as letting all people make their own decisions regarding signs and intersections. We are capable of handling individual situations as context-sensitive instead of assuming universal application is the only option.
It’s a hard life for those of us who believe in reincarnation. Future’s looking real rough.
Can you provide a source for the cannibalism? All I ever saw was speculation about a handful of possible code words, but never a smoking gun.
I’ve got the same deal. YouTube in my browser is effectively useless. But there are always ways to circumvent the bullshit.
Really, how many people came here with no relationship to reddit? Why does this place even exist in the first place? It takes quite a bit of time for a culture to evolve. The reddit mannerisms were always going to be a given.
I actually wasn’t referring to this case when I mentioned anger issues. I used it as an example of a common trait that a person can have while also wielding a weapon, which is insane to allow. Obviously someone who demonstrates the capacity to harm others shouldn’t have firearms either. But it shouldn’t even need to get that far to begin with. Sounds like we agree on this point.
Literally everyone is a potential harm to others regardless of if guns are involved. You’re talking about delving into massive gray areas and applying black-and-white logic to them. Someone with anger issues shouldn’t have a gun, but they shouldn’t be in prison either. Same deal with people with mental health issues and children. No one should have a gun imo, but confiscating them on a case-by-case basis is a better solution than the jack shit some groups would prefer to do, and it shouldn’t only happen in criminal cases.
I think you’re cool. I’ve been wanting to do a similar project, but I don’t have a camera ready yet, and life is happening quite a bit these days. I’ve got a few liminal space photos in my phone’s camera reel that I think are neat at least. I’d like to see what you’ve got if you ever decide to share. Would be cool to see.
I’m convinced those words are priming buzzwords to tell you how to feel. Just today, I caught the same words: “chilling moment gunman stops to put on his glasses” with ominous music over the footage. The man was killing people. Him putting glasses on wasn’t chilling. It was a mundane moment in an otherwise gruesome event.
No one’s asking for perfect. But a better system would account for outages, which we’ve seen plenty of so far. How’s that saying go? Don’t let perfect be the enemy of progress? It’s out of reach for a reason.
Yes, and? Things can be better.
“I’m unbiased, but I think you’re lying for no reason at all!”
You’re a silly man.
Settle down, grandpa. The world will spin another day if kids enjoy their free period a little bit.
Does she feel autonomous to you? Or more like an extension of you? That sounds pretty cool, either way!
That’s…brutal. Are they okay? Did something happen to them? Or is that just what they decided should happen?
That’s adorable. I hope Kiki means a lot to him :)
I don’t think it counts, but it sounds fascinating. Does everyone get along? Is it a tiring experience, or is it just a natural process?
I have my phone set to DND at all times, and I can confirm that you can allow certain notifications to come through. Only important notifications and calls from contacts come in. My peace of mind improved quite a bit with this change.
Wasn’t on a whim. And you totally can. Whether or not it’s a good idea or without consequence is a different story. However, it’s not a stretch to suggest that most people who deal with road infrastructure have dealt with unsafe conditions that could be avoided with restructure. If conditions were unsafe, nothing was being done about it, and the community did something about it to make it safer, power to the people. No one is suggesting a precedent should be set by this, but I would suggest that if we don’t want a repeating pattern, there ought to be a better, more expedient process in place than breaking the law to make this action unnecessary.