

Oh right, that’s the surprise. Not the warmongering and murder for capital gains. My bad for misunderstanding.


Oh right, that’s the surprise. Not the warmongering and murder for capital gains. My bad for misunderstanding.


Why are people making it out like the direction the US has gone started with Trump?
Considering there is no internal infrastructure, it would be way to tricky to allow public only assets access and enforce the gaps. They already aren’t , not meant to use it avoid stuff, but people already do.
But again, feel free to provide a source that says otherwise if a relevant member of the lower house has suggested tabling anything.
I don’t think anyone relevant in Australia has yet suggested banning VPNs. Too much gov infrastructure runs on them.
Sorry if I came off that way.
Assuming I was being rude seem pretty negative
I can see why you would think it’s negative, but i don’t have the ability to put into words why it really isn’t.
I have low expectations on your words alone. But also am satisfied with that because at best it’s meaningless, at worst I am wrong.
I do not and will not dispute that either.
Removed by mod
Yep, we sure are all of those thing as well.
Yes you are, you are winging about the the system to people like me who aren’t part of it
That doesn’t happen in reality
I actively steal from the USA
In what world is Australia far right? Center right/neoliberal today maybe. But not far fight, especially compared to other countries
Also I recommend compulsory voting.
What good is complaining amongst a communist org, if your democracy and elections a rlcapitalist?
Well then use that amendment that children keep dying for or stop complaining. So pathetic
As good as preferential/ranked voting is. Compulsory voting would have a much larger positive impact on US’ democracy
Ideally both
Compulsory voting would solve so many issues. HST’s take really falls apart when you consider the amount of people not participating in their democracy.
Isn’t the US a net exporter of oil. Can someone explain to me why this wouldn’t benefit them? Sell oil an increased cost with increased demand globally, cover costs at home with supplying the locally refined stuff for the population.
Anyone more in the know able to explain the gaps in my understanding?