

Human
Turns out being a human is pretty sick
Two lesbians in a trenchcoat


Human
Turns out being a human is pretty sick

I’m not trying to argue with you, I’m informing you of how this word is used in english-language spaces because you are using a definition which we do not use in english-language spaces. I defined it for you and explained to you the way it is used in english-language spaces, so if you want to keep using your incorrect definition you’re going to keep running into this problem.

In English, furry means anything on the spectrum from anthropomorphic animal to a human with animal traits. Any animal trait at all makes it furry. Any anthropomorphic trait in an animal also makes it a furry.
Your profile picture is furry art, because it’s an animal with the anthropomorphic trait of tool use. The Warrior cats series is a furry series, because it’s about house cats with the anthropomorphic traits of language, culture, tool use, etc. The art you posted in the other comment in this thread is furry art because it’s art of humanoids with animal characteristics.
Everything on that spectrum is furry.
You can argue about it all you like but you’re simply wrong.

English isn’t my language
This is where the confusion is coming from. Everything you mentioned is considered furry art in English. There may be a distinction in your native language but there isn’t in English.


It’s a not a trivial question to get an answer for by googling.
I literally googled “ethnic groups in china wikipedia” and “ethnic groups in the US wikipedia” and the results (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_China & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States) seem to immediately and unambiguously reject the idea of China as some kind of homogenous ethnostate that the US can’t emulate because it has too high a concentration of melanin or whatever fascist bullshit you were trying to say.


I lwonder if China’s population is more or less ethnically and culturally homogeneous than that of the USA,
It comes across as extremely insincere to just pose these questions publicly. If you actually wondered that, you would look it up. What you’re actually doing is covertly implying an answer that you think is true and would never question, without having the spine to actually state that answer yourself because you know that you have no actual facts to back up what you’re suggesting.


we had the most beautiful victory, everyone’s saying it, Iran never stood a chance
The king of iran said to me yesterday, “Mr. Trump you’re too powerful, we can’t beat you, please accept our unconditional surrender” and I told him that wasn’t good enough! I made him apologize to me for this terrible war and now we’re going to make Iran great again
Please buy my hats


The criticism is that westerners believe in something that both doesn’t exist (the popular “social credit” myth) and also is much closer to existing where they live.


I’ve done just shy of 2 weeks without food. I’ve never gone more than like 10 hours without water though, at least not while awake.
Fasting is fine. “Hunger” is usually anticipation of food. Once you push past the initial feeling it simply goes away.
Not drinking water sucks. Everything feels awful after a day without water.


Not even a little. That stuff is brittle and if it breaks you’re going to have deep cuts up your legs. You’ve got important arteries in your legs, you could be dead by the time you reach a phone to call for help.
Congratulations on your relationship, when’s the wedding?


This is pretty much where I stand. I don’t think gender segregation should exist but I don’t think it’s high on the list of things I want to dedicate energy to fighting. If you don’t want me on your hike I probably don’t want to hike with you anyway 
I think the bigger problem is groups that aren’t explicitly gender-segregated but which are so hostile to ‘unexpected’ genders that they end up being segregated anyway. That’s the sort of thing we should be trying to eliminate as much as possible. And I think that’s much more common with men’s hobby groups than women’s but I’ve never been a man so I can’t speak from experience as a man trying to get into something female dominated.


If you’re carrying a smartphone on you at all you’re already getting all the privacy negatives. I don’t see how playing MP3s through VLC is making that any worse.


I feel like we’ve lost the plot a little bit. How is this a meme? How is it even a joke, or humorous in any way? It’s just “you know how YouTube has become an ad-infested shithole? Here are all those ads, condensed, for you to look at again.” I don’t want to look at ads.
No thanks I only use yahoo answers


Abolish humans 


Ok so when he cancels the midterms, are you going to do something about it or are you going to wag your finger disapprovingly like every other time Trump has broken every single written and unwritten rule you pretend to care about
“he has no right!” He doesn’t care about rights, all that matters is who’s gonna stop him


There is a connotational difference, but it’s pretty minor. By definition they’re synonyms. Advertise has a more organized corporate vibe, like there’s an underlying implication that there’s money involved. Promote can be more personal.


I think if such a movement ever does arise (independent of a generally sympathetic unrelated movement such as a communist one) it will only be after things get a whole lot worse. Like they’re going to have to be projecting ads on the moon, filling every inch of public space with ads, replacing all music at stores with nonstop ads, etc before people will start saying “hey, this is seriously too much” and then that may eventually lead to the public perception emerging that almost any advertising is too much.
We need them to put the hexbear logo on one of the bombs