Not after chicken nuggies tho?

Grass.

Pondering how to control humans reproductive rights is certainly something you’re allowed to do and the rest of us are allowed to ask why

Oh? But I’m not going to do that tho. You can, if you want to.

My question was (how many times have I said this?) 'Do you think Strict two child policy should be a thing? ’ which is a different question from ‘how do I implement strict 2 child policy?’

Twisting People’s words is pretty lame yk? You better stop that, for your own sake.

You’re gonna have to live with the fact that people will form opinions about you based on your actions

Ok? That still doesn’t explain why you want to promote a very bad incorrect suspicion based on a normal question.

So? It still doesn’t mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know.

To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith.

There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans

This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion.

And my question wasn’t ‘Why do you think 2 child policy is good?’ It was ‘Do you think two child policy is good?’ Which could be answered with ‘NO’ which is a good answer (if there isn’t a moral way to implement it).

I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know

You’re not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I’d have deleted the post already. XD

How could I be sure? Even of there weren’t I might end up learning something interesting. (For example, someone else commented about ‘ghost people’ about China) What you’re saying sums down to ‘don’t ask questions related to controversial topics’. We always need to discuss them.

I also replied that it was not the point. The point is you’re accusing the question of being about controlling women. Which it isn’t. Why do you keep forgetting things we already discussed and going back to it?

Why?

Didn’t we just argue about neutering men?

If it’s about controlling anyone, it’s about controlling everyone. Which means it’s not about controlling women. Stop using that sentence like a buzzword. That’s pretty disgusting.

And btw, a question can have multiple answers. You ask questions because you don’t know some answers. If there was an answer to this question other than those I know, I might learn it by asking here. It can trigger discussions from which I might learn more on the topic. It is possible that there is an answer which is actually good and I don’t know about it. THAT’S why you ask questions.

I notice that you have replied to my other comment. You must know I meant that as an upper limit. Is there a reason you need to pretend you didn’t read it?

Read my other comment. I think I should have specified that in the post.

I said in another comment that I meant as an upper limit.

Annnnd I said it wasn’t. Didn’t I? Didn’t support it.

The point of this is, I’m not trying to control women just because I asked a question about the two child policy. Didn’t support it, just asked an opinion. How come you’re sooooo intent on twisting my words and finding Ill in everything I say?

Wdym

And men still produce sperm. If we neuter them after 2 children we can still do it. Not that I like that. Just saying there is something else

That you didn’t even think about how a policy around number of children allowed affects women is astounding

If you neuter men, it really doesn’t. It’s not that astounding

I never said that. Why’re you soo intent on putting words into my mouth?

Population could also be controlled by neutering men.

The question looks at finding an answer for controlling population increase. Nothing was ‘specifically’ said about women. If it affects women more, I didn’t think of that

Besides, there are other means for controlling population such as crushing men’s testicles which is also pretty bad but doesn’t control women.

If you were actually curious as to why I asked, I was just wondering, nothing more deep. I’m sorry.

It’s just too many people get ‘curious’ as to why you’re asking the question in the first place when you ask a slightly controversial question. I got 2 of these for this post alone.

I’m still curious what OP was thinking when posing this question to the community.

Its not a forbidden question. Nothing about my post said I support it. Should I explain to you why people ask questions? Are we simply not supposed to ask controversial questions on Lemmy?

Omg, that’s awful