

It blows my mind that you can just stumble across that stuff on a popular public forum


It blows my mind that you can just stumble across that stuff on a popular public forum


I’m not saying they’re correct in not calling it that, or that the system necessarily works that way, but they’ll have lawyers to look over everything in these sorts of scenarios and they’ll, usually, ask to play it safe.
Also, re point 2, it’s different to say “autopsy says it’s homicide” vs the paper/journalist saying that they were murdered. Unless it’s legally ruled as such (judge/court case), the news agency could be liable if they said it themselves. The headline is essentially just quoting someone else.


It’s unfortunate but usually wording like that is intentional and necessary, I.E if you say “mother fuckers murdered him” you’ll get sued.
I wouldn’t say Europe are overreacting. This particular post, “worse than nazi Germany”, yes, but atm they are being a bit too complicit in things like the US bombing and kidnapping the head of a foreign nation…
However the US isn’t literally building camps with the explicit purpose of mass murder and genocide. Don’t get me wrong, they’re still doing a lot of nazi and atrocious shit, but distinguishing the nuance is important.


Thank you, I’m saving this


Good thing they voted to give the nazi a trillion dollars


I feel like I’m missing context here


I’m confused, was there any expectation it would that I missed? As far as I know half life is dead. They never even finished episode 3 of half life 2 from like two decades ago.


In early first trump presidency there was a very real and concerning centrist to nazi pipeline on YouTube


While I do think the rich need much more consistent and aggressive punishments for their crimes… I am still not a fan of the state killing people. Especially when they themselves are often corrupt.
What’s to say they just want to do something like this to insert their nephew as new head of said bank etc?


Only if they’re female. If a male cop did it he’d get promoted


Dad seems like a real G. Stood up for his daughter, and showed empathy and understanding towards the kid instead of a lust for vengeance
The reason you cannot ban weapons is because anything could be a weapon. A rock, pencil, barb wire, glass, car, etc.
I know what you mean, but there’s always nuance, a limit, when it comes to things like this. Just because you can use anything as a weapon, doesn’t mean everyone should have access to everything. Rocket launchers? Bio weapons? Nukes?
Banning weapons wouldn’t make crime vanish. Also the whole point of crime is that you break the rules to do it. Your strict rules would just be broken by certain people hence creating the “crime”.
Similarly, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. If there’s no need to ban things because criminals will do it anyway, why have laws at all? Murder, rape, assault etc.
Ultimately, societally, we attempt to come to a collective idea of what we think is “right”, and then attempt to enforce that.
Initially most are very straight forward, like “don’t kill people”… But then the deeper you drill into it, the more complicated it gets. What if you accidentally kill someone? You give them something they’re allergic to without knowing it? Should you get life in prison?


This art style uncomfortably reminds me of that nazi who’s named after hard gray things


I was going to say, when it comes to Ukraine, this orange fuck flip flops more than the footwear with the same name
Probably depends on the type of company you work in. If it’s a long established one with lots of staff, they’ve probably realised this issue a long time ago and put plans in for it.
If it’s a more modern one that hired a bunch of solid old heads early on, they probably know better from the outset.
In both cases, someone, somewhere will have probably experienced it and said “never again”, so implemented (or improved) release procedures to ensure it doesn’t happen again
A lot of my teams have been on the younger side and for small companies/startups. So everyone either had a recent example to pull from or had first have experience
I think most people have done, or been part of a team that did, something similar.
At least most of the engineers I’ve worked with have had similar stories from their past


I feel like it should be similar to the whole yelling fake fire in a crowded theater thing. Don’t people get in serious trouble for that.
I mean what he’s doing is much worse. And yes, he is inciting violence


I used to watch her when, as far as I knew, all she talked about was science (mainly physics) news. You know, talking about the thing she actually studied in.
Then one day she did a “capitalism is actually great” video, and spouted a bunch of erroneous neo-lib bullshit. Thankfully most of the comments tore into her, pointing out the logical falacies and out right lies she was parroting.
I only watched a few more vids after that as she seemed to get more and more out of her area of knowledge and saying dumb shit.
I had no idea about the anti trans stuff though. I’d just stopped watching and written her off as the Nth person to be smart in one area and try and apply that to other areas where they have no expertise but think they know more about it than anyone else.
So yeah, fuck her
More special than ones we’ve detected, but our detection methods have a very biased available dataset.