The problem is that helium is notoriously hard to contain. It’s transported and stored super-cooled, but it still gases off, and to release pressure they just have to release it into the atmosphere. It effectively has a shelf life and so it has to be constantly replenished.
Yeah that would make sense with the way the cuts were so seamless.
Now You See Me. I don’t know if it was intentional by the uploader, but it was completely “out of order”. The video played fine, but all of the scenes were mixed up, so we were really confused. It happened on scene cuts though so it wasn’t totally obvious and at first we thought it was just some sort of weird editing technique because of the subject of the movie.
Mythbusters was terrible for this
Too bad no one gave him the idea to rename it last year.
I bought marbles for cheap at the dollar store last summer. They’re good for camping games when you don’t have a lot of space.
I’m not in a position right now to look at the files. What language is it written in? I wonder if Bedrock was branched from this project.
On Wikipedia, 4J is credited with working on Bedrock on the main Minecraft page, but not on the Bedrock page.
Edit: actually, I see on the PS3 legacy console edition page that it says it was written in C++. However, it seems that pocket edition was the source for Bedrock. Perhaps this was a separate branch from pocket edition? I would guess the PC target already existed if that’s the case and was mostly used for testing until Bedrock came along and they made PC a full target platform.
Nice, we’re not crazy 😜
What are you using to post links? This is at least the second post of yours I’ve seen that isn’t a link, just a picture.
A couch and a cell phone.
Has the accuracy of the snapshots actually changed based on this edit? After all, if it’s factual information being presented…
Yes! Quite literally, yes. They’re supposed to be an archive of what is on other sites. It doesn’t matter if the original site was, right, wrong, complete, incomplete, accurate, inaccurate, factual, unfactual, etc. If they change things, they’re editorializing and are no longer an archive, they’re new content - which is not the purpose people use them for.
I do agree that it raises the issue of what other modifications there may be,
That’s literally the point. It doesn’t matter how much you “understand the reasoning” (though you also think it’s childish and don’t agree with the actions). You can use it if you want to, no one is stopping you. The point is Wikipedia can’t trust it as a source of archived data and has every right to ban it.
That’s inappropriate, childish, and unprofessional. It makes them untrustworthy for citations. There are better ways of handling it.
If altering snapshots for a grudge isn’t your definition of “behaving poorly” for a site archiving the state of the Internet, then you must not think they have to be an accurate source of information. If they’re not an accurate source of information, then Wikipedia has no obligation to allow them to be used in citations, and they should remove such citations.
It sounds like archive.today is behaving poorly. As far as I know, Wikipedia isn’t exactly “big money”. If you know different on either front, can you please explain. Otherwise your comments are meaningless.
You can still install the drivers, you just don’t get them through windows update. I hate when windows update touches my drivers without my permission, so this sounds like a win-win.
Damn, I think I’ve finally forgotten my ICQ number.
Thanks. I’m not write sure why this whole conversation is even happening…
inane [ɪˈneɪn]
adjective
lacking sense or meaning; silly:
“don’t badger people with inane questions”
Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title. It’s pretty standard when posting to keep the title of the original article you’re linking to instead of editorializing it, unless you’re specifically going to fix something and note that.
Here, let me help you: copy, paste.
I’m not sure actually. I know it’s usually found with methane and in massive quantities. Maybe just sealed in by rock and time?