Surely all it says is that regardless of our hopes, plans, and intentions sometimes shit hits our fan and we have no control over it?

644 mile range? But what if I need to drive 650 miles once in a decade? Electric cars are just a stoopid fad.

It’s torment nexuses all the way down…

Heavily armed ICE agents to be stationed at all polling places “to prevent illegal immigrants voting”.

Calling it now.

It’s all about normalising boots on the ground in American towns and cities.

Isn’t America all about free speech?

He’s just showing them the gift shop on the way out.

We don’t need to invent new terms, like ‘AI Vegan’, when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

He’s been frustrated by the fact that he can’t make Wikipedia ‘tell the truth’ for years. This will be his attempt to replace it.

Cheers, fella! I’m AI¹, me!

[1. AI: a two-letter abbreviation which commonly refers to Artificial Intelligence but which can also, although far less often, refer to Abject Imbecile.]

Fake news. Some journo hack used photoshop. Here’s the original, with Trup standing true and strong despite them all being on a hillside.

It’s just utterly infuriating and miserable. This isn’t a Nelson-Ha-Ha.gif moment.

Ordinary Americans will suffer for this. People will lose their homes, their jobs, their lives. And ordinary people in other countries will suffer for it too - job losses for companies who majorly sell to the US are inevitable. Car companies in the UK (Landrover, Aston Martin, Jaguar, etc are already making noises about job-cutting).

And the vastly wealthy will benefit, as they always do, by picking up those bargain basement stocks which will, eventually, become valuable again. And it’s the plan. It’s always the plan. Transfer wealth from the many to the few. Brexit was a cash grab. Trump is a cash grab.

He wants to be the first trillionaire. This is the way.

If you build it, they will porn.

I knew Douglas Adams was wrong!

What is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything?

Every PC I’ve ever owned has had some version of vi installed on it pretty much on day one of my owning it.

I mean, I don’t disagree with anything you say, but that’s because I have a progressive mindset. Which kind of was the point.

Yes, I agree.

But surely you can acknowledge the possibility that some people believe transgenderism is an affront to god and an existential threat to children, or whatever, then their position is not dissimilar.

That’s the issue. What makes ‘this is offensive’ more valid than ‘this is dangerous’?

This is just another front in the war between religion and reason.

I mean it’s not an easy question to answer is it? How is my ideological position that ‘nigger’ is not acceptable and removing it makes the book suitable for modern readers any different from someone else’s ideological position that, e.g., ‘transgender’ is not acceptable and removing it makes whatever book suitable for modern readers?