Bots

AOC is not suicidal

Just wanted to echo the vote with your wallet sentiment. It’s the only power we have!

It isn’t clear because it doesn’t exist.

Ah brilliant! Case closed. Pack up everyone.

Look, there’s plenty of research indicating very negative effects of UPF on us, but it’s still an early field. The categorisation of UPF isn’t perfect no question, but that’s largely a result of the fact that, cooking processes combined with ingredients don’t make nice categories. We need ways to simplify the research for people who realistically aren’t going to look into the data, such as yourself.

If you’re really that opposed to the field, like your dismissive tone implies, then I’d advise not researching it, and eating what you like. But you aren’t going to erase the fact that obesity rises as exposure to UPF rises, that food preparation alters how our bodies process it, or that there are different health outcomes especially if you eat a lot of it. I’m afraid that’s science.

There isn’t a clear one because it’s not simple to define. If you follow the research, we can’t simply say it’s the ingredients used as the process itself can be bad. So it’s a hodge-podge of, “well watch out for this ingredient, but also ask them if they’ve put it through x and then we’ll know”.

It’s a whole area of research and it’s going to remain complicated, but we can’t give up on describing it at all.

Oooooh

I guess it was a wet SatansMaggotyCumFart

Unreasonably magnetic 😉

Duckduckgo Ecosia Startpage Brave search

I’ll go against the grain on this one, I actually think something akin to this is the right approach.

“Protect the children” will have to go somewhere, it’s not going to just die. Getting kids devices, with locked down access is better than the ridiculous changes to the internet that are being planned.

This might not be the right implementation, but I think the idea is along the right lines… or at least, the least worst option.

This was intentional. Nobody writes journalist@definitelynotthemilitaryemail.com instead of specific-name@militaryemailthatwealwaysuse.com

Protect whistleblowers

You can do that with a CPU, it’s just slower.

A huge petition that undermines the government’s democratic mandate is never a bad thing, even if they responded.

Ah, I’m not giving a full picture there. Technically you can use layered encryption like tor uses on the clearnet. Tor additionally exposes tor-only services that route exclusively via tor’s onion routing (not just http wrapped inside an encryption onion).

i2p works differently under the hood, but the shared piece is exclusive services, only accessible through a non-standard protocol. That’s how you’d get a different web. Unless we’re talking physical layer stuff.

Basically. Look up onion routing (tor protocol).

You guys took James Corden off our hands for years, seems only fair.

Meh, it’s just software

I’m shocked. Shocked! Well not that shocked.