

Pretty sure Trump said he wanted Zuck executed


Pretty sure Trump said he wanted Zuck executed


I didn’t reference it as a source you need to get a grip lol
It’s as accurate as me roughly working it out would be.


I do know their limitations. They’re data manipulators and interpreters not generators. All the numbers were verified.


Forgot this place was still trying to convince itself ai hadn’t improved since 2021.
Numbers were all verified and referenced. Although some are inherently estimates (# undocumented, etc)


Just done it myself with deepseek. Fed in a list of the executive orders and got it to model scenarios and knock on effects.
That’s worse case, if he manages to deport a significant % of immigrants, retains all funding freezes, doesn’t have anything knocked back in court.
Just realised any tariffs that go into effect are not included in that estimate either.


He’s already said he’s thinking of using the insurrection act to invoke martial law within the next 90 days.


Removed by mod


Same that’s why we organised between the students. Lecturers weren’t handing this out


The right wing factions pretty much say they’ve been guaranteed as much.


Was very common in my uni. We had our full degree on mega so could read ahead.
Op needs to infiltrate the Oxford student fb group


Well it’s not his tool as you clarified. But we know Marc is in contact with both ai16z and musk. And would certainly like to do the things alleged.
Believe the breadcrumb he’s referring to is using Trump as the public example. Maybe the prompt correlates to bot messages posted to Twitter too.
He says ‘we left’, so he personally wouldn’t have needed the perms.
H1b doesn’t seem like a red flag to me. Plenty in my year got entry roles in FAANG in the US after their degrees and had to get h1b sponsorship. Musk got rid of most other staff and only has a skeleton crew of loyalists and h1bs. I imagine most the remaining 10% are aware intricacies of the various interference he’s demanded. (Many of which are documented outside of this).
They are ‘advanced’ in that LLMs can now trick most people when they couldn’t a few years ago. Think you’re reading too much into that there. Seems unlikely the people who want to manipulate people with chatbots would have the self awareness to create an ad like this. Maybe a leftist putting together the obvious and embellishing but seems a bit too coincidental.


Otherwise someone else could fork it and replace them.
It’s decentralised in theory just not in practice because of them owning all the relays and appview.


You’re right he’s not the founder but he is an investor and has interacted with them publicly



That third party was founded by Marc Andreessen. He’s currently staffing doge and on the board of meta. He switched to maga as he believes in accelerating tech at all costs (effective accelerationism) and has written a manifesto on it. As well as publicly commenting about convincing the public of the truth via social media. If he didn’t do what the post is claiming he would’ve wished he did.
His publicly stated goals are basically to Elysium us


This is Musk we’re talking about here. The guy who requested print-outs of code to review, and doesn’t even know basic commands. Could he have said ‘My pal has a thing for that, use that it’ll be faster’ ?
I still stand by my initial assessment that this is most likely a group that is simply using some disturbingly creative disinformation tactics to implicitly claim affiliation with subjects like Andreessen and Musk and fundamentally “promote” their “product” without even being subtle about its potential criminal and/or disruptive uses.
What product?
He notes in the comments he’s a junior dev btw, which would explain the lack of detail
Because I’m not even sure what the team was doing was “illegal” as much as it was unethical. I’m just a junior dev. I do grunt work. To be really honest, it is hard for me to trust the government because whistle blowers don’t fare well in this country. Elon is the richest man on the planet. My main reason for releasing this information is to make sure the rest of the world knows what is coming for them.


You mistake me as trying to convince you of it’s objective truth, rather than sharing information that stands even without the whistleblower. Someone could’ve figured out it was super weird a org backed by Marc had a public example like that and made this all up. But why was it there in the first place? Super odd considering his MO to accelerate us at all cost. If he isn’t doing it he’s going to be wishing he thought of it.
Confused what you mean by the API. Eliza is a framework for agents right? Whatever they were doing they’d do it via their internal API as it already has all the methods etc for posting. So they could either write something custom like eliza to manage that bit, or just connect Eliza?


Look who is behind Eliza too. A crackpot who flipped to MAGA to accelerate us to ‘network states’. More info here
As someone who works in the field I also believe there are several red flags in the way the article is written and a bunch of contradictions. For example, “hiding crumbs in the code” would generally imply something slightly more sophisticated than a public file that the author himself tells you how to find in the repository with even a screenshot of it.
Maybe there is, doesn’t seem like anyone else is bothering to look.
The main issue for me though is that it is highly unlikely that the owner of X would need to use an external tool that establishes a finicky integration with X from the outside to generate fake content when he obviously has control over the internal private code and data of X itself. It’s beyond naive to think that if they wanted to create fake accounts, fake posts or manipulate the content users see, they would need this Eliza thing to do it effectively. This tool is clearly aimed at people who don’t own the platforms they intend to use it on.
Could still acces that through the API all the same? Sure there’s plenty of other frameworks they use they didnt build themselves.


Very odd though, no? Why would they use a Trump bot as the public example?
We already have hard proof for most of the other stuff, I guess someone could’ve seen the example and fabricated the article based on our shared knowledge. But I think that falls into the ‘nothing ever happens’ box


If you look at the second example you’ll see Marc andreessen mentioned. He’s a follower of Curtis yarvins dark enlightenment. Also works closely with Elon.
https://www.ft.com/content/1f14799f-69a1-41cb-bf7f-6f16f9ad4a8b
Not if you’ve peed since the last time you’ve came.