The federal rule of procedure don’t allow such broad sweeping remedies that apply upon parties not before the courts.

There is irony in making someone with your name explain themselves

Every year about 8,000 people file their cases for cert at the Supreme Court. Each year they grant cert on about 80. Roughly 1/1000 odds. Those about 8,000 cases include cases that have also previously filed in past years without cert.

Amicus briefs are not uncommon. They often don’t grant cert when there are no novel legal questions. The Supreme Court simply doesn’t not have the ability to hear every appeal. Them not granting cert in any case should not be taken as a dispositive.

In 21/50 you need a license.

The real question is why the hell is a governor engaging in international trade or diplomacy? Art. 1 Sec 8.

Well said. A sober look at the lives of these people often reveals a sad truth.

9/10 sovereign citizens are victims. 1/10 are charlatans selling a fiction to those in dire need of a way out of legal trouble.

I would challenge you to listen to the other entirely if

Yeah that doesn’t solve the issue of planting a bomb, though.

“Your honor my client was only engaged in economic terrorism” is not a good excuse.

Cool story, the jury will still consider it murder.

That still would be barred by Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020). If they do any on that basis they’d instantly get sued. 7/9 of the justices are the same since them. 4 members of the majority remain on the court and the two new appointments both should be predicted to uphold the precedent.

This one has been involved in multiple incidents seemingly involving her. They also apparently have a security guard so non zero chance someone was working graveyard shift.

They’re probably seeing if this was an act of economic terrorism. Feds are big on interstate commerce.

The GOA backs him and given his speech at their conference I’m willing to bet he isn’t keen on doing that.

This is a motion to dismiss not an answer. That’s how those work. It is linked to by the journalist in the article.

Yeah that’s how it works.

Other comments in this thread reflect a lack of appreciation for the prior system. Once upon a time the king’s men could arrest legislators unfavorable to him to bar unfavorable legislation. Today we have legislation barring the arrest of representatives while the house is in session.

Shout out to the menial workers at Apple Maps who are going to have a crap day at work tomorrow because of the thing their boss made them do, so they don’t get fired and replaced by someone else who would do it.

I agree with the sentiment on Gulf of Americas. But I think the singular (and referring to land of both continents) makes more sense. Firstly because it rolls off the tongue better. Secondly because the existence of the ‘North America’ and ‘South America’ both imply that those lands are parts of a larger body of land called America. North America being the Northern half of America. While South America presides in the Southern half.

‘America’ being the United States is only reinforced by the fact that the United States is the most significant nation in global politics East of the Pacific and West of the Atlantic.

Homicide isn’t just a legal term. See also fratricide, sororicide, patricide, matricide, suicide, regicide, etc.