SpaceX is a good company

How you figure? I suppose it’s “good” if youre one of the types who enjoys seeing space travel privatized, extremely high stress and turnover, environmental hazards, toxic waste dumps, water pollution, and trillionaires.

Let’s see old Donny try to wriggle himself out of this jam

This doesn’t help your specific problem, but for what it’s worth: airvpn allows you to set a port # which is retained when the VPN hops to a new server, or is reset. In other words, I set the port # in airvpn a year ago, and i have kept the same port since. I haven’t kept super up to date on VPN trustworthiness, so maybe airvpn is no longer recommended.

China is still the world’s leading polluter

This is a rhetorical sleight of hand that conveniently glosses over the actual history of polluting nations.

So are SIM cards.

Assuming you dont have a platinum PSU, you could upgrade to a more efficient PSU. That probably won’t give you as much gains as tweaking bios settings though.

This is the best strategy.

However, if you ever knew youd NEED to use public charging, check out USB condom adapters. They open circuit the data pins.

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

You really think this is bulletproof?

Have Trump run for Speaker. Hell, have him appointed as secretary of agriculture and have the people above resign. Its really not that difficult when your constitution is held together with bubblegum and pinky promises.

There is nothing in the constitution that says he cant enjoy a third term.

the stupidest motherfucker in the country can do the math to see it’s unconstitutional

It’s not at all unconstitutional for Trump to enjoy a third term as president. All the Constitution says is that he can’t be elected a third time. There’s nothing that says he cannot run as VP and then succeed into POTUS once Vance steps down.

and then have 11 of the 12 listed examples being perpetrated by one group

Why are you focusing on who was president?

The claim was: American Imperialism enjoys bipartisan support

Your counterpoint was: that cant be true because some of these examples were during republican POTUS.

That doesn’t mean anything. American Imperialism can still enjoy bipartisan support, even if the president is a republican.

Take the DR in 1965, for example. LBJ was president, but his call to war was answered emphatically by both Democrats AND Republicans in the name of anticommunism. Do you seriously think that the fact that LBJ was president disproves that this meddling enjoyed bipartisan support?

So what are you saying? That American Imperialism is not the fault of America, but the fault of Republicans? Quite a convenient way to absolve yourself.

My main point is that American Imperialism, especially in Latin America, enjoys bipartisan support.

basically every one of those incidents involves a Republican administration

Using military money that was allocated in the preceding year by democrats.

Do Publicly Owned, Planned Economies Work?

Public transportation was efficient, extensive, and practically free. Subway fare was about eight cents in the 1970s, unchanged from the 1930s (Szymanski, 1984). Nothing comparable has ever existed in capitalist countries. This is because efficient, affordable and extensive public transportation would severely limit the profit-making opportunities of automobile manufacturers, petroleum companies, and civil engineering firms. In order to safeguard their profits, these firms use their wealth, connections and influence to stymie development of extensive, efficient and inexpensive public alternatives to private transportation. Governments, which need to keep private industry happy so that it continues to provide jobs, are constrained to play along. The only way to alter this is to bring capital under public control, in order to use it to meet public policy goals set out in a consciously constructed plan.

The Soviet Union placed greater stress on healthcare than their capitalist competitors did. No other country had more physicians per capita or more hospital beds per capita than the USSR. In 1977, the Soviet Union had 35 doctors and 212 hospital beds per 10,000 compared to 18 doctors and 63 hospital beds in the United States (Szymanski, 1984). Most important, healthcare was free. That US citizens had to pay for their healthcare was considered extremely barbaric in the Soviet Union, and Soviet citizens “often questioned US tourists quite incredulously on this point” (Sherman, 1969).

Regarding meddling in Latin America?

Correct.

"Doesn’t look like anything to me. "

Who’s saying we are doomed to fail?

Things are bad but this is a winnable fight with the people on our side

This goes completely contrary to what you’ve said so far. Everything you’ve said so far makes it sound like you think this is an unlosable fight.

There is a lot at stake here, and there’s no guarantee this fascist doom spiral is just going to fizzle out on its own. The goal now is to get as many people armed as possible.

So then why did we have to sacrifice an entire generation to kill fascists in World War II?

I use jellyfin with the shield tv (tube version) w/ an lg g1 oled. No compatibility issues for all my high bitrate, dolby vision, dolby 7.1 files. However, performance of this old device is starting to get bad. Requires an occasional reset.

So why resist them if they are doomed to fail?

Are you watching different news than me? This “fucked” cult just coordinated over years to successfully capture the government, and started doing ethnic cleansing in short order.

Claiming that the fascists are doomed to fail seems naive at this point in the fascist descent.