Language is something you can teach, but it isn’t really something that’s easily controlled. The term “OS” already means something like ‘a space that lets you interact with and manage apps and services on a personal computing device’ for most people. This is the case because of how its used with Apple, Google, Windows, Steam, Meta, etc…

So the literal operating systems of other kinds of equipment, such as a vending machine, might eventually end up with its own moniker if the distinction becomes important enough to matter.

My goodness! How did you upscale that image so beautifully??

The taxes are really high, so Nordic folk tend to base their online businesses in countries with lax tax laws then live off the proceeds in their home countries where the benefits are great.

I don’t like how the specific IP address is simply no longer listed.

Sounds targeted.

He probably doesn’t want to disclose that CSAM was included.

Honest question. As someone who has used and loved MacOS for many years, what would be the best Linux distro for me?

Many of us are in our own little bubble. Nearly all regular folk use AI instead of Google now.

Is this why I can’t buy a steam machine?

Fair enough. Dems have handily shown us just how competent they are at handling problems such as Trump taking over the courts, the FBI, the FCC, DOGE, illegal tariffs, the Epstein cover up, ICE, voter fraud, voter suppression, and so many others…

Nonsense! We’ll get loads of sound bites to guffaw over in YouTube!

They’re holding out until they can add another Republican to cancel out the release of the Epstein files.

Well at least he would have been okay with it.

The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.

They never specified who’s security…

I sometimes approach this like I do with students. Using your example, I’d ask it to restate the source, then ask it to read the title of that source directly. If it’s correct, I might ask it to briefly summarize what the source article covers. Then I would ask it to restate what it told me about the source earlier, and to explain where the inconsistency lies. Usually by this time, the AI is accurately pointing out flaws in its prior logic. At that point I ask again if it is 100% sure it didn’t make a mistake, and it might actually concede to having been wrong. Then I tell it to remember how and why it was wrong to avoid similar errors in the future. I don’t know if it actually works, but it makes me feel better about it.

I’m more inclined to believe it’s gotten better at being convincing.

And you can tell clients that it’s just made up and not actual confidence, but they will insist that they need it anyways…

That doesn’t justify flat out making shit up to everyone else, though. If a client is told information is made up but they use it anyway, that’s on the client. Although I’d argue that an LLM shouldn’t be in the business of making shit up unless specifically instructed to do so by the client.

It annoys me that Chat GPT flat out lies to you when it doesn’t know the answer, and doesn’t have any system in place to admit it isn’t sure about something. It just makes it up and tells you like it’s fact.

I’m a teacher. I do.