

No. It’s really bad, and that is my first impression of this software. Not fair but, judging a book by it’s cover and its a bad cover 🤷♂️
From Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, living in the Battlefords, Saskatchewan since 2008. Lucky to have the most amazing wife, and we have 3 wonderful daughters. An Inuk in treaty six territory. I love open source software, dabbling in graphic design and video editing, and cooking. I love the Leafs.


No. It’s really bad, and that is my first impression of this software. Not fair but, judging a book by it’s cover and its a bad cover 🤷♂️


What a horrible logo, it took me so long to see the fox. I kept seeing a horrible bird or beluga looking up


I am curious how the 90 and 81 percent numbers were got to


Could you provide the active wars and their years please or the link to confirm the other stated percent?


I did a very lazy AI inquiry and I got 23% for the USA and 26% for Russia.
I have used both as Ubuntu flavours when I needed a lighter desktop on older hardware. XFCE was absolutely solid, worked and brought new life to the hardware. But, I wanted just a little more pizazz so, I moved to Mate. It was just as quick, felt a bit more modern but it wasn’t as rock solid as XFCE. XFCE is perfect for stability. Mate is more modern but younger so maybe not as solid. It’s been a while since I took either out for a spin though. Time to fire up the VirtualBox I suppose.


Rarely hear about DSL anymore, http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
Kubuntu 24.04 because it’s a solid desktop and I have nothing against Snap. If it works then I don’t care if it’s a deb flat or snap. p PPAs were fun and exciting but I broke my system more than once with them back 10 years.
I’ve set up Joplin with Syncthing and it’s been working for me.