How does the map work? I’m confused since I see triangles, which I assume are ships, on land. Also what are the dashed lines coming from each triangle?

Sorry I stole it from a reddit post, so I don’t know the answers to your questions.

I’m calling Trump’s bs. That’s why she won the peace prize. He’s trying to make it less obvious, but he’ll “mull it over” over the coming weeks and in the end she’ll magically be the most qualified.

It also might be easier to defund the department of war. Cutting defense spending might sound unwise to someone who doesn’t know whats actually going on. Cutting war spending when there’s no war is a much easier sell.

I think there are some requirements, might not be fair, but they exist. Also I’m pretty sure wanting to blow up a plane is one of them.

Okay that’s true but if we circle back to my original point, it would seem that asking to see ID makes sense from a security standpoint.

If a person has no weapons and still is “too dangerous” to be on a plane, why are they not in jail?

I think that’s the point, they’ll get arrested if they try to fly. Doesn’t that make things more secure?

What makes the real ID real?

There is no actual proven security reason for the TSA collecting this information.

That doesn’t sound right. If there’s a list of wanted or potentially dangerous terrorists or criminals, and I provide ID showing that I am not one of those people, isn’t that a security reason for showing ID?

With an electrical fire in a ballroom full of 900 of Trump’s enablers and the doors fail to open due to corner cutting?

Happened to me once outside San Angelo. Noticed the car behind turn their headlights off for a second, then they flipped their red and blues on. I was pulled over because my license plate lights were out, but I’m pretty sure they just wanted to see who was driving the shitty car with out of state plates through their town. No ticket, no warning, didn’t ask to search the car, just annoyingly nosey.

This whole privacy thing is based solely on belief? There’s no practical reason for it unless you’re on a state actor’s list or something?

Inspire me

Here’s my personal answer to that question. I care about privacy. However, maintaining it has become a never ending process that gets more complicated as time goes on. Plus there’s always more one could do. I’m not going to stop using payment cards, I’m not going to get a prepaid phone running graphene, I’m not going to whatever comes next.

I’m starting to think that my personal cost/benefit analysis is leaning towards not caring about privacy. What have I gotten out of trying to maintain privacy? Inconvenience and expense. What have I gained from letting the creepy corpo overlords watch me? A decent map app, autocorrect, 3% cash back at restaurants and groceries, facebook marketplace. It really seems like I get services and discounts for giving up my privacy.

I even signed up for that fucking global entry program so I can have TSA precheck and get through customs fast. I hate that. It feels so wrong but I’m growing increasingly sure it doesn’t matter. I’m not special, the government won’t care about me now or in the future, and the benefits of not caring outweigh the gains of trying to hide.

This is a terrible point of view, I know, but I just don’t care anymore. I like the idea of privacy, but I’m finding the practicality to be too difficult.

Sounds like we won’t be testing anything since no one else is testing.

All of the jokes in early simpsons seasons pointing out problems inside the US are still valid today. Long standing problems have not been solved and if anything the situation has continued to deteriorate.

How did you get the tanks in your basement?

Make sure you use that printer once a month. I let mine sit and the ink dried on its nozzels or somewhere and now it won’t work. I’ve attempted to fix it with no luck. Was a great printer until that happened.

no one really liked him being there, even his own party.

His own party appears to like him for some reason. I doubt they really do, but they seem to think they’ll lose elections if they don’t grovel to him.

From what I’ve seen, it appears a very vocal minority of .world users cannot tolerate any criticism or viewpoints opposing capitalism/liberialism or NATO.