Oh I’m not judging or caring about previous relationships or drama. I was just after the facts after all the grifts floating around “go fund me for wife and son” raised a couple red flags when I thought she was the mother of 3. Turns out she was in a different type of relationship hence “wife” and the youngest was from a different marriage. That all sort of falls in line with go fund me. So sure I’ll donate some to help out.
I mean, if i was a prosecutor I’d show the video and say “you can see here she was clearly serving away from the officer who discharged his gun several times into the deceased. He was never in danger for his life. She was not a clear and imminent threat to others. Should she have done what she did? Should she run from the cops? Should she have listened and stopped? Those are great questions with various answers but not the point of the trial. The question is, should she have been shot to death for doing what she did? That answer is no. He is guilty of murder.”
So she does have 3 kids 15, 12 and 6. First marriage had the first two and the second marriage had the final one. Second husband died and they are looking to raise money for the son and common law(?) Spouse.
So maybe the first two children are with the first father still?
I read somewhere that she was a mother of three? Or did this son have a different dad? Just trying to make sense of the information floating about.
If it’s someone claiming for ‘fame’ or to brag I generally laugh. But if they are trying to claim it to get something free or discounted it’s annoying. I’ve never really gotten upset about it.
I compare it to people that claim to be handicap. Sure, whatever you want to say, doesn’t really bother me. But if you park in the handicap places and you are a healthy 25 year old driving your grandma’s car, but you park there because you can. Come on man…
They are not able to answer questions or change simply via a software update.
I mean to be fair… that’s the current drive through experience anyway isn’t it?
The LLM is taking the order. Interpreting what people say into that simple text description. Not everyone talks the same or describes things the same. That is i believe where the bulk of the LLM is doing the work. Then I’m sure there is some background stock management and health checks out manages as well
Again, those seem to just be excuses to my untrained political eye. As someone that fairly regularly deals with red tape, if the powers that be want to cut through the red tape they can and will.
Yeah, because they “didn’t have enough to make any appreciable difference.” I say similar things to people I don’t want to help but I don’t want to upset them. Sorry I don’t have time to do that, having one more person wouldn’t make that big off a difference etc.
You may very well be right. And that exact reason is the only reason they didn’t send eggs. But I’m guessing their are more than that singular reason.
Be an ass on the international scene. Show you are untrustworthy and do everything you can to not pay a bill. Just be generally unreliable as a trade partner.
Get turned down when you ask internationally for help.
shocked Pikachu
“Allows you to control the downtime”
*unless your company infrastructure was designed by a 2 year old, you don’t have infrastructure admins that believe is still the wild wild west, and your Security team knows how to manage it’s av and doesn’t block the file servers
What proposal is that? I would like to spread the information if you have a link
You would be surprised what people have time to think about while browsing their phone on the throne.
If you think Ukraine consumes 100% of his thoughts then you are not giving puttin enough credit. He isn’t infamous because he is dumb, he is infamous because he is cunning, underhanded, and brutal in what he does.
“nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms”
The exact wording that disqualifies Obama
You don’t want to give the people chasing you time to identify and disable the deadmans switch
I’ve thankfully been in a relationship for over a year. But when I was looking the dead ending the conversation was huge for me, I’d say a third of the matches did it. I used the 3 strikes rule, because sometimes people are busy and they just want to respond but don’t have time to continue the flow of the conversation. Which is fine.
I once has a girl follow up 2 weeks later asking why we didn’t go on a date? I told her that was the first question she asked me and I felt she wasn’t into the conversation.
Don’t be so desperate to get into a relationship that you try to carry the whole thing on your shoulders.
A surgery that my little one needed was being denied by insurance two weeks ago. Yesterday when calling for the pre surgery instructions we were notified that last surgery was approved. So we were doing all three requested surgeries at once and only having to put her under once.
I don’t know if this was the cause but there was a 180 on the approval.
I’m guessing it’s a power thing. They have “trophies” to get off too
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence
‘Proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt’
I don’t need a jury or judge or prosecutor to tell me what my own eyes have seen. That man shot her. Beyond a reasonable doubt. He did it. The only semantics here are if he can get away with it under some stupid immunity rule. Even if he somehow gets off the charges, he killed that woman.