Doesn’t change the fact that FUCK THAT

I think she’s really pretty in the 3 pics I can see. Subjectively of course.

You probably get 10 women a day vs 500 men a day.

Um

Disagree

It’s both. They’re not pretending to be bigots.

Usually a friend or relative of some higher up.

Why are you guys trying to find some logic in this?

That’s the State of Jefferson movement, most likely. Cascadia is about the coastal regions, State of Jefferson is about the inland (right-wing) regions of Washington, Oregon, and Norcal.

That’s actually not far off from how things shook out economically in the Civil War. The North had roughly 5x the manpower, firepower, and money of the South. The South was never going to “win” the Civil War, due to that disadvantage. For them, “winning” would have been making the war costly enough to the North that the North gave up.

Calexit is the name of the California secessionist movement that has been around for a few decades.

And we have absolutely no data to suggest that’s happening. It’s purely hypothetical.

To do so legally, Constitutional Convention. 2/3 of states would have to agree to let it go. And everyone would have to hammer out what happens to federal assets inside the state.

It’s fairly widely known along the west coast. No one treats it like a serious movement, but like a “man, that would be nice” kind of thing.

Legally, a state can’t secede really, but the other states could agree to let it go. It would require a Constitutional Convention, which would require 2/3 of states to agree to let it go.

They’re being so caustic because they get a sick power rush from trying unleash a mob on someone. That’s all. They probably don’t give a shit about children.

Ok, but by that definition Google should be banned because their trawler isn’t guaranteed to not pick up CP.

In my opinion, if the technology involves casting a huge net, and then creating an abstracted product from what is caught in the net, with no steps in between seen by a human, then is it really causing any sort of actual harm?

Way to not answer the question.

It would probably make me distrust the prosecution, like if they’re bringing this up they must not have much to go on. Like every time a black man is shot by police they bring up that he smoked weed.

I guess my main complaint is that it’s insane to view it as equivalent to real CP, and it’s harmful to waste any resources prosecuting it.

This sounds like you’re searching really hard for a reason to justify banning it. Pretty tenuous “what if” there.

Like, a dildo could hypothetically be used to sexualize a child. Should we ban dildos?

It’s so vague it could apply to anything.

No one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.

Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?