

Agreed, and thanks for the history lesson!


Agreed, and thanks for the history lesson!


Then why doesn’t “voltage” bug you? It’s the same sort of word: unit + “age”.
To fully satisfy you, it should be:
electrical potential difference = current * resistance.


That was the joke. They are making everything in the equation end in -age. Because “amperage” bugs them.
Volt + age
Amper(e) + age
Ohm + age
I get the same screen anytime I use any VPN server.
When google started to index paywalled things…
Google has (had?) a rule. If a site lets them index their paywalled content, then the site must deliver the full content if the referrer is google.com or else they will de-index the site. So when clicking a link on google, the full article should appear. It was an old trick to just google the article title to find a link and click through to read a paywalled article.
Is that policy gone now?


Sure, it’s not a coöp, but at least they pay $20/hr starting wage, and $30/hr for half of their employees because they stay there so long.
It’d be cool, though, if the eyes didn’t have it. Can you mask out regions of the STL when applying fuzzy skin?


Yeah, I think you’re right. (No sarcasm.) I should keep such opinions to myself. I’m not at all against being a maker for the sake of making, actually. I guess I’m just a camera snob. Calling my criticism “pixel peeping” kinda set me off, and I lashed out, but that’s on me. :(


You’re absolutely right. I shouldn’t have said anything. (No sarcasm.)


Haha! You don’t need to peep any pixels to see how terrible that camera is.
I’m just not into Lomo crap. Spend time with a real camera and take good photos. Tinker with your skills as a photographer and not with making toy cameras that you’re going to never use again after one roll of film.
My bad. I shouldn’t have said that.


“Awesome”
I don’t see the point when a used film camera would blow it away by a million miles.
The point is, in fact, to make something, and I shouldn’t be a camera snob.


I had mine off for years. I would look at my subscribed channel feed and that’s pretty much it. But I recently turned it back on, and I actually like it. I pretty much only watch videos about science, math, philosophy, technology, SNL, and… Symphony of the Night randomizer races.
My entire recommended feed is just more of the same, and I’ve discovered tons of new channels to subscribe to. A lot of the channels I subscribe to only post like once every 2-4 weeks. I don’t want to have to do a search just to have something to watch at mealtime. Having random things recommended is nice.
If I watch a weird video out of the blue, I might see two or three recommended videos of that kind next time I open YouTube. Not at all like what OP’s screenshot is showing. I even went on a deep dive watching Snooker videos and it would still only recommend a few a day. And after I stopped watching him, I no longer see a single one of those videos in my feed.
I’d say it’s working pretty great for me. I don’t see what all the fuss is about.


If you looked at the list of LAN clients then blocked one (the printer), then, yes, you blocked the MAC of that client.


I don’t know why anyone would buy the original Prusa instead of the new-and-improved Prusa. /s


DDG really likes to give bullshit AI generated website results. “Top 7 [thing] to buy in 2025”. And after reading for 2 minutes, you realize the page is utter shit. Paragraphs of fluff, some referral links, and absolutely no expert advice.


to be honest elon using the nazi salute was probably not in the training data
That’s not how it works. If the training data had to include specific people doing specific things it’d be useless. Instead, the training let’s it infer individual image elements from different sources. It never had to be trained on orange pentagons to be able identify “orange” and “pentagon” from an image of an orange pentagon.


Ordering light ice at McDonalds always results in a full cup with less ice.
If you’re allowed to drive a motorcycle, you should be allowed to drive a tiny truck. It’s your life.