one of the advertisements in the main menu or any info area widget

Okay, my biggest issue right with that has nothing to do with Edge.

She was probably given a golden parachute and is set for life.

At which point gas stations will just keep prices the same as people have gotten used to it and blamed Trump for it.

The remaining 32% of this rating are entirely your neighbours and relatives supporting the idiot fascist child rapist for president.

Really supports the argument that no matter how terrible something is, 32% of people will support it.

The intelligence of 20% of the population is in this part of the bell curve:

Or you could not sign up for known predatory businesses.

And this rock keeps tigers away, how much would you like to pay me for it?

If they don’t have a point then what the fuck have you been going on about?

I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I’m pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they’ve purchased to put an end to it.

The average user does not need the same level of device security and lock down as a CEO of an independent opposition-aligned media outlet. It’s absurd that you seem to be arguing otherwise.

Perhaps a CEO of an independent opposition-aligned media outlet should be using more strict security measures far above what is necessary or even accessible to an average phone user.

“statistically doesn’t happen” is not equivalent to “has never happened”. It means the number of times it has happened is such a statistically insignificant % of the user base that it does not pass the smell test for being the reason to inconvenience every user.

Other people not knowing how to secure their devices is not an excuse for my device that I own to block me from using it the way I want to.

What % of users side load apps vs what % of users had someone else install a bug on their phone?

It’s a situation that statistically doesn’t happen, and now every legitimate user is being inconvenienced to stop it? This if like agree verification laws being sold as “protecting children” as an excuse to spy on and control people.

It’s between the series and movie

The fact that they had to make a riddle for the AI to trip it up

“I want to take my car to the car wash, should I walk or drive” is not a riddle. It requests basic understanding of what is being asked.

Even if that were true, you’re still paying more than you would be for a “dumb” TV that doesn’t have those features. So everybody loses but the company selling the hardware still sees a sale. They lose a lot more if they pay the cost to produce and then never sell the device.

You are paying for features you don’t use (such as Internet access). That’s not a win.

I think you are underestimating how accurate LLMs are because you probably don’t use them much, and only see there mistakes posted for memes. No one’s going to post the 99 times an LLM gives the correct answer, but the one time it says to put glue on pizza it’s going to go viral. So if your only view on LLM output is from posts, you’re going to think it’s way worse than it is.

And look at what is on my feed just this morning: https://lemmy.world/post/44099386

It’s not just that LLMs are shit. It’s that people trust them way too much and are shocked when the predictable happens.

Even if you mark it down for incorrect answers it’s still going to beat most people. An LLM can score in the 90th percentile in the SAT, and around the 80th percentile in the LSAT.

And of course the AI bro goes for the “vibes” argument. You can’t just state that as true without providing a source. Or did AI tell you it was true?

For example: fewer than 10% of tested AIs consistently properly answered that you need to drive to a car wash in order to wash your car: https://opper.ai/blog/car-wash-test

That’s a question so far below anything on the SAT or LSAT and 90% of LLMs can’t even get that right.

If you’re doubting my percentages on the accuracy of LLMs I’d encourage you to test them yourself.

I’ve tried using LLMs. I don’t use them for research, because why the fuck would I? Better, more efficient tools already exist for that. When I had something that a search engine can’t help me with and LLMs are apparently “good at” it immediately proved itself to be worthless.

I’m just imagining how spammy it would be to see this reply on every comment that has more than 69 upvotes.

Yup. At one point that number was 69 in order to get to where it is now. Good job.