• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • I don’t think you know the definition of sex offender, it doesn’t always mean someone’s done something to kids. You can be a sex offender and only attacked adults. Hell, you can be a sex offender without even touching another person. So “sex offender” isn’t enough here. A “pedophile sex offender works”, but even then it doesn’t show that he has done the worst sex crime that can make you a sex offender, so I’d say it’s still not enough. A “child rapist” is really the best way to ensure everyone knows exactly what he’s done.


  • Explain how it’s evil to allow the US companies to move their production out of the US? The US corporations could have kept industry here, but they decided to fuck themselves over so that a few shareholders’ margins went up by a few percentage points. That wasn’t China being malicious, that’s the US lacking any sense of foresight while being blinded by greed.




  • Yup. All my IoT devices are on a network that doesn’t have access to the internet. To control remotely, I use a VPN. Even though I don’t think it’s technically necessary, I take the precaution of blocking connections to the big company’s APIs/websites for all my IoT devices, just in case.

    I wish this were easier for the layman to do. Some companies like Unifi make it pretty painless, but they are expensive and it’s really hard for the non-networking-savvy folks to know exactly which devices you need from them to have a working setup.






  • You are also missing the huge advances they’ve made in their contributions to FOSS, like proton, FEX, arch, etc. Steam has done an insane amount of legwork to get Linux gaming off the ground. They are the one company that made migrating off of Windows and onto Linux a valid option for me, and a bunch of other folks. Linux was ~0.89% of their userbase in 2020, and since their contributions to these FOSS projects, it has gone up to 3.05%. That’s crazy, considering it had been at or below that 0.89% since 2016.



  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I partially agree. I think not voting is a vote for whichever candidate you like the least, since if you had voted somewhere else, the candidate you like the least would have gotten a smaller percentage of the votes. If you want to cast a blank vote, vote for whichever party would do the least damage., since that will actually have a measurable outcome. If you think all candidates are equally bad, including 3rd party, I think voting for someone who has some level of cultural relevance and holds the same views you do makes the most sense, since that makes the statement that you would vote for candidates like that person.


  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You make it seem so black and white. I don’t think it’s as simple as the lesser evil choice is 100% wrong full stop. For instance, I support the lesser evil mindset over the not voting mindset. However, if one exists, I support voting for a politician that genuinely supports your views over the lesser evil mindset.

    Not voting makes no sense to me, because a null vote has the same effect as a vote for whichever candidate you like the least.


  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess the fundamental difference between your perspective and mine is that I don’t see it as refusing to play their game, I see it as just another move in their game. I think there is no way to avoid playing the game, and so you should make a move that leads to the least bad outcome. It doesn’t take much effort, maybe a day of research at most to pick whoever you want to vote for. Not voting is technically a vote for whichever candidate you like the least, at least it has the same outcome.

    That being said, I agree with you in that that won’t result in change on a larger, long-term scale, and that actions must be taken outside of the system to get what you want. But that stance and my stance on not voting are not mutually exclusive.


  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t agree with this, but I understand the sentiment. While I think, at the core of it, the folks at the top of both sides have the same goals in mind, I don’t think the elections are rigged to that degree. Also, while voting 3rd party feels like a waste of a vote, I don’t see it as one, since third party votes are counted, and can have some semblance of social sway. Not voting and voting for a party that you disagree most with will have the same effect however, since both pull the vote towards the candidate you like the least.


  • As someone with a little insider baseball knowledge, it was just a few hours down of DynamoDB and DNS. However, that caused EC2 to go down for ~1 day, which causes pretty much 1/3 of the internet to go down. Once EC2 sorts themselves out, then teams/companies (almost all amazon services use EC2 in the back end) that use EC2 have to get their ducks back in a row, and that can take any span of time, depending on how well their code was written to handle failures + how many people they are willing to pay oncall/overtime.



  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t know if I understand what you are suggesting. Are you saying the working class should vote third party, or each person should vote for themself? Or when you say vote for our own parties do you mean not vote at all?


  • Carrot@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlVote!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think I understand what you’re saying. Are you saying that the time it takes to look into a candidate is the damage being done? I was thinking on a larger scale. All 4 options lead to a politician getting sworn in, who will inevitably, directly cause people to die. Picking the option that appears to be likely to kill the least people would theoretically cause the least damage in their 4 years. I’m calling 4 years the short term here.