A paper from around a decade ago talked about using WiFi to identify key strokes so with large data models we have today I would assume they could get pretty good fidelity on a person. Maybe not enough for “beyond a reasonable doubt” but probably enough where your WiFi company is selling your data on what you do at home

Maybe I am mistaken on e bike ratings but can’t you have a class 3 without a throttle? And isn’t the definition of a class 2 that it does have a throttle?

It requires inference… maybe that’s a bit too complicated for you

Considering your restatement was wrong I am going to assume it’s you

“ How many cars are sold per year in the US compared to Europe?”

It’s a comparison between two places and one sells more than the other. The answer to which one sells more is the US

Well this is a waste of my time so I will leave you with one final look up. How many cars are sold per year in the US compared to Europe?

Hint the answer is the US

Imagine you owned a store, what seems better, having 40 customers come in and all of them buy or having 80 people come in and all use up time with a salesman and then only 45 people purchase. You would end up spending a much more significant amount of the sales revenue on the larger showroom and more staff. This isn’t my opinion this is why the American market has been prioritized, that and the fact that Americans spend more on cars per year

California has different emissions requirements (not safety) but since they are a strict upgrade to the rest of the US (and comparable to other int markets) as long as you follow their requirements all cars in the US can be sold without any contradictory requirements

A very common kpi used is to examine the success of a campaign in a per target demographic so having the much lower response rate is worse

If you are making an ad campaign, all of the US speaks the same language, generally has the same safety regulations, and a much larger percent of the people are your target ad personnel

The EU is a cohesive unit for regulations but speak many different language and once you branch out of the EU to all of Europe you can see why there are huge advantages to advertising in the US.

So no it’s not the absolute number that matters

There are around 290m cars in the us for the 330m people

There are around 420m cars in Europe for the 730m people

So while the actual amount of cars in all of Europe is more than the US the percent car ownership in a single country is insane

Ethanol can still cause carbon build up as it is made of carbon and at high temps can form carbon non polar byproducts

It shows an absolute callousness to the murder of 3 people, wrongfully implies the killer had some affiliation with the state, and makes you sound like a cunt

For advice on not being a callous cunt, when 3 people are murdered how about not using that as a soapbox to insult where they lived…

It’s not a joke if you hit boron with a neutron it releases the energy in the form of an alpha particle which is just a helium atom.

So take some boron-10 put it in a neutron flux and you get helium. This is being done in nearly every nuclear power plant in the world every second

Helium may not be renewable but we can manufacture it from things like boron

You need to lower your expectations, we aren’t going to go from the current system to immediately jailing billionaires for the crime of being rich.

Small incremental changes are more realistic and as long as we keep moving forward, that is progress. If you frown upon all progress because it doesn’t fix every problem all at once then we just won’t get any progress

You can use that circular logic for all taxes. If a CEO pays more taxes they are just going to make up for it by raising prices or cutting employee wages

That’s not in the article at all, like yes he got fucked by the insurance company and the hospital and just life in general but he paid off all that debt built up an IRA with several hundred grand in it, owns 20 acres of property, and traveled around the country

He is currently driving for uber so they can maintain a higher standard of living and so they can leave money for their children

He pointed a loaded, cocked firearm, and pulled the trigger with a minimum of 5 pounds of force

reasonable doubt that it was a premeditated murder I will buy

Reasonable doubt that he committed manslaughter, no chance

And considering his quote saying he wouldn’t be too upset if she was raped because he has two other daughters I think the title is accurate…

It means the only way for it to fire is to fully pull the trigger it can’t “go off for no reason”

The gun also had to be loaded and cocked…

Do you seriously believe that guys story

“He said: “As I lifted the gun to show her I suddenly heard a loud bang. I did not understand what had happened. Lucy immediately fell.”

An alcoholic POS who recently relapsed and said he wouldn’t care that his daughter was raped is now drunk and showed her a gun and it just went off for no reason and he couldn’t remember if his finger was on the trigger…

Give me a fucking break… he called her into the room and shot her and made up a story afterwards

Did you read what I read… I addressed both, it’s the same conclusion

There is no advantage to having it done in advance

Having it “ready to go” makes it suspicious

It’s a short letter to write

Even if a person did want to have it ready the more logical thing to do would be to type it up in a word doc and then copy paste the relevant part onto the report with the official letter head

I am understanding your point and refuting it. It is not that you aren’t being clear with your opinion it’s that you believe your opinion is fact and are refusing to listen to criticism. It literally feels like I am talking to a Comcast chat bot where I keep saying “problems with billing” and you keep responding with “would you like to hear about our new cell phone plan”

If you aren’t going to read what I am writing and have a conversation then just don’t respond because you have not addressed the most basic refutation to your point I have stated numerous times

And if the jewelry store owner had a dedicated person on the staff whose job it is to fill out insurance reports would he tell the person to write the letter in advance (giving away that he intended to commit insurance fraud) or would he bypass the employee who now is suspicious and is a possible whistleblower?

Then is the insurance investigator in on it as well? Or why isn’t the insurance investigator suspicious that a person had a full list of the things stolen/burned immediately when it happened instead of taking the normal amount of time to process it

And finally the same point I have iterated multiple times now that you keep ignoring is WHATS THE ADVANTAGE OF DOING IT IN ADVANCE? It literally is only a chance for it to be more suspicious and makes you look suspicious.

It’s a generic letter head that was likely copy pasted from th day prior