Correct.

🔻

Downvoted, textwall!

/j

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it’s “an honest bump” to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

I actually like tar. Yes, it could have a default, but its also from another time. And remembering Xtract Zip File is not that hard. (v is for verbose for those wondering)

This is a nod to the “year of the Linux desktop” meme

So 2026 is “the year of the AI PC”?

Lol

Sorry I misread your comment.

You are right, this definition is wrong.

The article literakky says “a huge number of IPs”. Do you have more information?

Random people saying shit like “why do open source, if you still sue?” or “Copyright needs to be abolished don’t use it for anything”

It’s really narrow minded to see it like that honestly, but they unfortunately do exist.

The gearwheel on the bottom right has options for language and resolution.

Down detector does apparently not work for Annas Archive. The site itself works for me, but down detector shows it’s down.

Maybe change your DNS and try again.

Okay, I’ve read into your post a bit more and something is fishy. You have libc6 for different CPU-architectures installed.

Programs for i368 and amd64 should not be installed on the same machine. The error probably stems from that.

Run the following to find out the architecture:

uname -p

If it says ‘x86_64’ then it’s amd64 and if it’s something like 'i368’ then it’s that. Otherwise, your system might be really borked…

And then remove the wrong one.

Try all the cleanup commands, so:

apt autoremove; apt clean; apt autoclean; apt update

Then reboot and try again.

But yes, it looks weird.

This is also in part true.
Today I was searching for multiple things regarding jinja2 and was always recommended a site that no longer exists, as top result, mind you.

No they didn’t and they still don’t really do that.

There are too many things (nowadays?) where you have to literally write a question on reddit, stack overflow or Lemmy or the likes and explain your situation in minute detail, because what you find online through search engines is only the standard case which just so happens to not work for you for some odd reason.

Believe me, when I say that, because I always try search engines first, second and third, before even thinking of using some bs-spitting AI, but it really helped me with two very special problems in the last month.

Monetary gains, mainly.

You can make tax write-offs for work in an e.V. and also donations. Open source development would then be kind of state sponsored which is nice.

Them not really checking anything is the best part of than my opinion, because then anyone can have a basic income for trying to culturally improving themselves.
This is such a great win.

Because it is not a good option to route that kind of traffic. It’s okay for most use cases, though.

Call me old-fashioned, but I ain’t gonna suck the white juice out of ass pimples.