All these corpo thigs hoping the VCs notice the “replacement” before the tower comes crashing down on them. Morons. The whole lot of them!

I appreciate this. I actually like this song lol

Yeah! Kids shouldn’t have different rules than adults! Same rules for all ages!

Sincerely,

The Pedophiles

Oh, interesting! I didn’t know that!

Ok

I had a Starbucks franchise owner tell me that Starbucks doesn’t sell coffee; [they] sell an experience.

Then improve the experience, I told him. I seriously have no idea how they’re still around.

Don’t assume I’m your man lol. It seems you’re responding to the wrong thread, as no one mentioned bootloaders before your comment from an hour ago. Maybe you are, in fact, attempting to fabricate a conversation out of thin air. You lonely? If so, I’d be more than happy to have a genuine, respectful conversation with you, but none of this bullshit.

My go-to was 37.com. It was a sad day when it closed down, like a decade ago.

I remember it. I asked it if Jeeves was gay, and he said that he prefers the term “jovial”. He was a treasure.

You’re right, you are making a lot of assumptions. No one said anything about bootloader. This change doesn’t change bootloader. This change is about apk installation. Reading the many available articles regarding this change helps in understanding it.

Apparently, and assuming this is transport, vat would be 0%. Besides fees not shown in the screenshot, I don’t know why this doesn’t math.

Passenger transport in a vehicle, boat or aircraft that carries not less than 10 passengers 0% VAT Notice 744A

Isn’t vat like 15%? £49 + approx. 15% = £56.50.

Untrue. You can install whatever you want on Samsung’s android variant.

This change makes it so you can’t install software (such as F-Droid, NewPipe, Google Camera, Samsung Notes, etc.) from APK, unless you install them directly from Google’s Play Store [without going through unnecessary hoops and 24-hour delays].

And, pretending “Samsung has been doing this for ages”, it doesn’t make it right.

[Edit for clarity]

An LLM can’t “go rogue”. They’re all just toys that idiots are using for critical infrastructure functions, then they bitch when they burn themselves on the fire they’ve created in their lap.

That program was called RunAsDate, and it was amazing

They own the (closed source) app, which has full access to your decrypted messages. The messages might be e2ee in transit, but they must be decrypted for you to read. This means that they also have access to them in this state, the same as you, and there is nothing preventing them from resending those decrypted messages back to their servers while you send them (before they encrypt) or after your receive them (after they decrypt).

Counter:

First intentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability.

First unintentional offense: meaningfully huge fine, equal to no less than 25% of annual revenue.

Second intentional offense: won’t happen, due to the first intentional offense permanent stop order.

Second unintentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability.

The only way to fix this is to make it hurt from day one.

I’d vote for that 100%

Doesn’t even amount to the taxes they paid the month the fine was issued. It’s barely the cost of doing business.

Let’s do some logic. You’re an evil multitrillion dollar company that makes billions in profits by breaking the law. But, by doing so, you’ll be fined 12 million dollars, of which you’ll contest and get reduced to 7 million. Barely a blip on the monthly revenue stream.

I wonder why they keep ignoring (breaking) the laws.