• wildcardology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    If he believed that he filled a 20,000 capacity venue with 100,000 people, hell believe that he has at least 1 fanatic in the jury.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Brilliant move by the juror. Getting crushed is just that much worse when you have some hope.

    (although I highly doubt this was a calculation by the juror and more Trump reading into something that was never there)

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The thing is, you can sometimes get through to these Trump supporters if you can deprogram them from their echo-chamber… That requires very long conversations, an expose of facts, dismantling of their fallacies, and keeping them away from right-wing propaganda and peer pressure for an extended period of time.

      … Which just so happens to be what jurors go through.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        If that’s what actually happened, I wonder if those things stick when he re-enters civilian life to go back to having Fox News blaring 24/7.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Six weeks is all it would take to undo years of brainwashing from every direction? I doubt it.

        • Spez@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It could very well be a case of “Never meet your childhood heroes”. Trump probably acted like a spoiled brat and the juror saw it first hand.

          • aleph@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Trump did; it’s a matter of public record. He violated court instructions about blabbing to the media ten times, and was held in contempt by the judge twice.

            He repeatedly make false and misleading statements about the trial, the judge, the witnesses, and even the jury on social media and to the press in the entrance hall of the court building itself. The idiot just couldn’t stop himself.

            Had he been a regular citizen instead of a former president, he would have almost certainly done jail time just for his behavior during the trial.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          There was an article around here this week, and I didn’t read further about it, saying it only takes a few days off FB to get people to turn around on conspiracy theories.

          I guess lies take constant reinforcement?

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Six weeks in a different environment is a long time. Talk to people about their first six weeks on a new job; or at boot camp; or even summer camp.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Six weeks plus 11 people worth of peer pressure all getting increasingly pissed off at you for wasting their time with your obstinate dumbassery, I guess.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’ve had some progress with a local trumpet, but he has too many friends pulling him back for the effects to last long.

          He snaps out of it when I point out how capitalism (billionaires) is often the problem, or how the Rs block immigration reform. He’s been able to see some truth now and then. But later he turns his TV on and it’s all Hunter Biden’s fault for him again. Also for some reason we’re all gonna eat bugs lately.

            • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yeah, I just said “you mean lab grown meat? if tasteslike hamburger and doesn’t have to be full of antibiotics (and methane) I’m for it.”

              He actually liked the idea of no antibiotics (fits with his doctors bad mindset).

        • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Without Fox News and others, who will tell them what to think/say/do? They probably had their first unobstructed, own thoughts in years.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Why does EVERYTHING give me new ideas for tv shows that I could create if I were in the entertainment business?

            Ok, imagine this show:

            A 60 year old man stars as the lead character. He’s an overweight confederate flag wearing, racist, who just had his company relocate. Instead of working in Ohio, his factory is moving to Vermont. And so he’s going there too.

            Now out of his echo chamber, he continues to be himself, the only way he’s ever known how. By repeating fox news talking points as his own original ideas. Completely unaware that he’s now surrounded by NPR donating listeners who already know the talking points he’s going to say for the day, and how to rebutte it before he even opens his mouth.

            Faced with a new and challenging world changing around him, he feels he’s going crazy, until a conversation on a park bench. He talks with an elderly homeless man feeding the ducks, who shows him the deception he’s been led to believe, the brainwashing he’s victim to, and the consequences it has for people he’s never met. He has his eureka moment, and decides to change.

            The show starts with him as the new manager of the factory, as the previous manager was shot and killed in a random public shooting that he had nothing to do with. He was just there. Being that the main character is the only other person to move from Ohio, he’s the only one who knows how to run the business. So now he’s working with an all new crew. Instead of 97% older whites, it’s now a total hodgepodge of races, ages, and backgrounds working the factory floor.

            The series follows his progression and growth from being a racist out of touch boomer who’s only personality trait can best be described as “fox news”, to a more mentally complete well rounded person with compassion and empathy for people who may not be just like him. You see him at times struggle with this. He may not have fox news in his ears anymore, but he did for 30 years previously. So he’ll still slip up from time to time, and have to unlearn what his former life instincts would lead him to say and do.

            He gets advice everyday from the elderly homeless man in the park. Whom on the last episode pulls his coat hood back, and it was Bernie Sanders all along.

            • bazus1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Don’t make him the manager, make him a shift leader that is asked to be a union rep when the employees decide to unionize. As he looks closer at the shady practices of the private equity firm that bought the company and moved it, he begins to understand the incompatibility of Fox talking points and what’s happening in real life around him.

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well, education in general… Which is why they are so absolutely desperate to dismantle our education system.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I honestly don’t think lawmakers put that level of thought into dismantling education. Votes are the only goal here.

            Somewhere along the line, it was Limbaugh for me, conservatives noticed that educated people tend to vote liberal. Well hell, how do we explain this?!

            The pundits launched a full-frontal attack on education and those “ivory tower liberals”. Who the fuck are these people to tell me how to think when I got the Bible and my gut feelings?!

            I watched this unfold. No one talked down on education in the 70s and 80s, nothing like the conservatives do now anyway. Then… Remember Rick Santorum baggin’ on Obama for having 2 degrees? While Santorum had 3. FFS, Obama taught Constitutional law at Harvard and the GOP acted like that made him less able to judge Constitutional matters.

            Now “education bad” gets votes, that easy. I don’t think there was a real plan. As always, the GOP rolls with what works emotionally. (While the Democrats think they can win on logical arguments.)

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              After Sputnik went up, there was a giant call for the US to push more kids into STEM. Kids are always a political issue.

              Heck, watch ‘The Music Man’ if you don’t beleive me!

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                We don’t need more kids to go into those fields we need more funding for those fields. If you want depressing look up what happens to the bulk of people with physics, or geologist, or chemistry undergrad degrees.

        • Godort@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          My understanding is that juries in America dont really deliberate on a verdict or a sentence. Thats up to the judge.

          Instead, I believe they’re presented with all the facts and arguments, then determine based on that information whether or not the the prosecution’s claims hold up.

          So its more of a “based on the facts you have been presented with, do you think the defendant did X”, rather than “should the defendant be punished for this crime?”

          Most Trump supporters understand that he’s a criminal, but believe that his actions are in service of the greater good. So in a situation like this the distinction between “do the facts line up” and “should he be punished” is an important one.

          • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I was on a jury in Texas in 2019 and we were tasked with both.

            First part: Based on the facts you have been presented, do you think defendant did X?

            If yes

            Second part: You have determined that defendant did X. Now determine the punishment

            That second part was by far the more difficult of the two

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Close, but jury instructions are very particular.

            “This is the exact law and how it works. Did the defendant run afoul of this law?”

            A competent judge and prosecutor forces the whole show to stay exactly in those bounds.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s exactly the kind of thing a New Yorker would do. “Oh, yeah, sure, I’m on your side, buddy, we got so much in common.”

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      There was one juror who got their news from Truth Social and Twitter so I am guessing they were not trolling.

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would tell you I got my news from God if it meant I could put a nail in Trump’s coffin ;)

  • acetanilide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was very surprised by this part of the article:

    Trump made careful effort not to mention or criticize the jury in a press conference on Friday morning.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Someone must have hammered home how if any harm comes to a jury member that can be linked back to something he said, then he’ll be in the shit