• CatAssTrophy@safest.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Quantum effects are literally one of the things that computers are designed specifically to avoid. We’re bumping up against the point where we can make conventional computer chips more dense the same ways we have previously since quantum tunneling causes some noticeable errors in computing when things get too much closer together.

      • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Of course! This has been true for almost 30 years!

        But if your argument amounts to, “the soul exists because the brain has got quantum hootnannies in it”; well… :gestures broadly:

        • CatAssTrophy@safest.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago
          1. I said nothing about souls. If I’m talking about souls (without direct prompting), I’m deep in a psychotic episode.

          2. I don’t really get what you mean by the gestures broadly thing? I’m very open to an expansion on that thought, but have no current sense of what that means.

          3. It’s not just the vague idea of quantum hootnannies, it is the fact that intentionally inducing extra quantum hootnannies in the brain structure of animals has a noticeable impact on the effects of various anesthesia, i.e. the “anti-conciousness drugs”.

          I’m not claiming there is definitive proof, I’m simply stating there is some real, empirical evidence that supports the notion that consciousness is an emergent property reliant upon a maybe narrow range of emergent effects from quantum mechanics that are inherently absent from Turing machine computational models.