• SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I guess? I agree that any shooting should happen responsibly (train people before you give them guns ffs), but what do you mean “the dog will not kill the cop”? People do die from dog attacks, and even if it isn’t that common I don’t see how anyone can be expected to just accept being mauled. How are you supposed to defend yourself?

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean that the dog will not just jump and rip off your head. Dogs need time to kill someone. This cop had backup. There no way the dog would be able to maul on him for so long that he would die. If you can’t get the dog off him then yes, as last resort shot it. Shooting the dog on sight is stupid. Mailmen interact with dogs all the time and don’t have to carry guns to survive.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Go look at how small the dog is and then come back and feel like a dumbass for thinking any rational person would be scared of it.

      • SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Where exactly am I supposed to see that? (I already mentioned having to use Reader Mode for OP’s article; here’s one that probably has the same pictures.) The size of the dog is not clear from the Knicks shirt picture, though I notice he apparently takes up a full couch cushion. In the still from the aftermath video, the blurred out dog is almost as long as the grieving woman - it certainly doesn’t give the impression of a small dog, though without properly seeing the posture and more visual references it’s hard to actually tell. This source says the dog was a “golden retriever/St. Bernard/poodle mix” - that doesn’t sound small to me.