• meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think the thought is that native islanders can harbor racist notions against white people. Whether that actually played a part or not remains to be seen.

    Edit: what’s with the downvotes? I’m explaining why they might try to play the race card. Not condoning racism, claiming racism for sympathy, or his actions.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Maybe so, but it’s a terrible defence as the lawyer stated it.

      Like the lawyer is in a Hawaiian court and says what boils down to “bro the natives only hate him cos he’s white - plus they way more seals your honour”. That’s a terrible argument. 1) know your audience. 2) “a different race also broke the law” is not a defence. P. S. Didn’t downvote, I appreciate the attempted explanation.

    • VanRayInd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t think it would’ve made a difference, when he was told there was a fine for attacking the seal and that it’s extremely endangered he responded with “I don’t care, I’m rich”

      Dudes face immediately became a target regardless of race

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure. But I wasn’t addressing that. I was only commenting on why they might use a “racist adjacent” statement.