Mozilla, the non-profit tech giant behind the Firefox browser and has warned regulators that age-restricting VPNs “would undermine the privacy and security of all users”.

In a formal submission to the UK’s Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Mozilla pushed back against a recent consultation that considers age-gating the best VPN services to stop minors from bypassing age checks mandated by the Online Safety Act.

  • kobra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m sick of this. If it’s that big of a deal, we just need to ban kids from the internet. Full stop. No intermediary measure will be good enough.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sounds like a good idea. Now we just need a way to determine which users are kids and which are adults. I’ve got it! We can use age verification for that, and we’ll probably also need to ban vpns to stop kids from getting around it.

      • kobra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Kids can’t actually get access to the internet on their own. You have to purchase an internet connection of some sort via a provider and kids can’t do that. Public access, like libraries, would have to use ID/age verification in person, sure. But not the general internet. That responsibility falls to the parents of the children and you can create whatever punitive laws you want to punish and hold parents accountable for preventing their kids from accessing the internet.

        It’s literally the same thing we do with prescription drugs and alcohol. Some people have to lock them up, but mostly those bottles are unlocked and accessible to kids all over the world and we expect the parents to do the gatekeeping and then punish/hold the parents accountable when they don’t.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No no no. Just take the American approach. Shoot the kids in the schools! What? Is that a bad idea?

        Oh, it is?

        Well so is age verification.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      How do you propose to enforce such an idea? Some sort of… birthday testimony? Some sort of… oneness corroboration?

      • kobra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The parents have the responsibility of enforcing it and that’s it, that’s enough.

        If you want to add laws to say that parents that fail to keep their kids off the internet can lose their kids, fine idgaf. Create whatever you want to hold parents accountable but as parents, this is THEIR problem.

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        How do we enforce such an idea? I don’t know, maybe, we can create some kind of “parental control” software, and if parents don’t use it, then we can pass something called “child neglect” laws and punish them with that?

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      We just need parents that can do the parents, it’s not the government resposability to watch out for people childrens on internet to that extend…