Sure, an administration that follows the law might agree with this interpretation.
My point is that the government has authority to act and individuals have to sue to fight it. I’m not saying that revoking a visa over unpaid child support is a correct interpretation, or even “right” in a subjective moral sense. I’m saying it’s within the NSPM-7 definition of what they can do to act first and let objectively shitbag people sue them to undo it.
https://commons.law.famu.edu/faculty-research/155/
Sure, an administration that follows the law might agree with this interpretation.
My point is that the government has authority to act and individuals have to sue to fight it. I’m not saying that revoking a visa over unpaid child support is a correct interpretation, or even “right” in a subjective moral sense. I’m saying it’s within the NSPM-7 definition of what they can do to act first and let objectively shitbag people sue them to undo it.