• KatherinaReichelt@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Not really. Blockchain technology has one use case and that is collaboration between partners who don’t trust each other. So we’re talking crypto coins, where not all nodes are really trustworthy and there is an incentive to cheat. But there’s no reason to bring this tech to your Git repository because you really do not want untrustworthy participants in your code. Only you should have access to your Git rep, and then the easier solution is to host it yourself and use a normal database.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Maybe I am using the wrong technology for the right idea here, in my statement. What I’m really trying to get at is, wouldn’t we benefit greatly from having decentralized control over git hosting? Ideally then, The People decide what happens with it as a public resource — not a fickle technology company with competing interests and revolving management.

      The solution should be immune to DMCA takedown requests, IMO.

      Edit: I’ve never really thought about it… but decentralized hosting could seriously mess with IP laws, couldn’t it? Leaks can be done in a way that they cannot be undone.