Protecting children online is crucial, but forcing every user to hand over their ID is a privacy nightmare waiting to happen, according to the head of the Swiss privacy firm
Wow, I guess I could say the same to you, huh? I’m not going to bother trying to explain the myriad ways you’ve misread and misunderstood my comment, go ahead and keep believing whatever it is you’re believing right now, it doesn’t bother me a bit.
I wasn’t being defensive, I was merely dismantling your argument piece-by-piece.
And you can’t be bothered to engage with my argument? I addressed yours in detail, and you can’t even come up with a response? Sounds like someone who knows they’ve lost the argument, if maybe only subconsciously.
the myriad ways you’ve misread and misunderstood my comment
What way did I misread or misunderstand? Was it when you told me to sign up for the brownshirts? Or when you questioned whether we “need or are entitled to” a decentralized internet infrastructure?
I don’t know, if you think I misread those things, then maybe the problem is that you didn’t elaborate them very well. Cause it seemed pretty clear that you were hostile towards the idea of a decentralized internet infrastructure.
go ahead and keep believing whatever it is you’re believing right now, it doesn’t bother me a bit.
Oh, so you didn’t read anything I said? Or you didn’t understand any of it? And you can’t be bothered to read something that might force you to reexamine your beliefs?
And then you tell me to keep on believing whatever I believe? As if I’m the one being obtuse. That’s more projection on your part.
You know, plugging your ears isn’t any way to win an argument. That’s what fascist sympathizers do. This is exactly like trying to explain climate change to a republican.
Wow, I guess I could say the same to you, huh? I’m not going to bother trying to explain the myriad ways you’ve misread and misunderstood my comment, go ahead and keep believing whatever it is you’re believing right now, it doesn’t bother me a bit.
Um, he put up some pretty good rebuttals… How did he misunderstand you, exactly?
I wasn’t being defensive, I was merely dismantling your argument piece-by-piece.
And you can’t be bothered to engage with my argument? I addressed yours in detail, and you can’t even come up with a response? Sounds like someone who knows they’ve lost the argument, if maybe only subconsciously.
What way did I misread or misunderstand? Was it when you told me to sign up for the brownshirts? Or when you questioned whether we “need or are entitled to” a decentralized internet infrastructure?
I don’t know, if you think I misread those things, then maybe the problem is that you didn’t elaborate them very well. Cause it seemed pretty clear that you were hostile towards the idea of a decentralized internet infrastructure.
Oh, so you didn’t read anything I said? Or you didn’t understand any of it? And you can’t be bothered to read something that might force you to reexamine your beliefs?
And then you tell me to keep on believing whatever I believe? As if I’m the one being obtuse. That’s more projection on your part.
You know, plugging your ears isn’t any way to win an argument. That’s what fascist sympathizers do. This is exactly like trying to explain climate change to a republican.