AI can’t be all that bad. The problem I’m always seeing with AI is a double-edged sword. You have corporations shoving AI in just about everything, treating it like its a cure for cancer and that really rubs people the wrong way. Then, on a more of a society level, you’ve got people who use AI for an assortment of things like making art with AI and still accredit themselves as an artist to people who treat AI like a therapist when it is not advised to.

However, I’ve found some benefits with AI. For example, I’m chatting with ChatGPT on credit cards, because it is something I may lean towards getting into. It’s helping me better understand than most people have tried explaining to me. Simply because it is giving me a more stream-lined response than people just beating the bush.

  • eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    feedback suppression has been a thing for ages

    it does not require AI, all you need to do is identify the consistent tone and subtract it out

    • MorkofOrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I know it doesn’t need AI for older versions of feedback suppression, but there are newer systems using it that are more effective at dynamically subtracting those frequencies

      • eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        i have never seen a pro live sound engineer use AI to do this

        and i dont think a neural net will have significant improvements over standard ways to do it like the neve 5054 at the same latency

        • MorkofOrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah you know what, I definitely am wrong about this, I totally thought they were using AI but that makes way more sense