• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Understanding of what, though? We already know they destroyed documents, and there’s mundane procedural explanations for the hypothetical discrepancy in amounts, and the group under suspicion has demonstrated they kept plenty of incriminating (or at least extremely suspicous and relevant) documents unshredded. What’s the question an investigation here would answer?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you really trying to suggest that investigation should only happen if you already know what you’ll find? This is so intelligence insulting I don’t know if you’re calling me stupid, you stupid, or both. 👋

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Nnnnno, I’m suggesting that unless you have a question that you want answers to there’s no point in investigating something. Even a fact-finding mission has a goal. Whats the goal with investigating this?

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          “why were these fucking files destroyed?”

          How is that not abundantly obvious? Answer: it is.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yeah, this is exactly my initial point. You already have that answer - the BoP’s team’s job was to, among other things, preserve relevant material (ergo the rest aren’t preserved). Shredding documents is so routine that they have a shredded document dumpster, so presumably documents are regularly shredded when they are deemed not worth preserving.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I admittedly didn’t read the article, but if anything people are saying itt is true then some investigation would be required. Honestly I am way too fatigued to read every article about these fascists. If I hadn’t seen 100 pieces of undeniable evidence about their crimes, I’d probably be less likely to make quick judgements like these 🤷‍♂️

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                While I 100% understand and sympathize with the fatigue, maybe you should read the article before you spend a couple hours calling someone stupid. At the very least it would give you more ammunition.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  you spend a couple hours calling someone stupid

                  This is not what happened. At all. So I’m back to assuming anything you said is false.

                  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    This is so intelligence insulting I don’t know if you’re calling me stupid, you stupid, or both.

                    You use the term stupid to describe what I’m saying, and repeatedly insult me / my argument while admitting you don’t know what you’re arguing about. So yes, that’s exactly what happened.