• iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    /e/OS is android lol. Yes it’s better than the version of android that ships with phones by default, but grapheneos is still way better than e/os (even though they’re all android)

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      We need hardware requirements so that not just pixel phones can get grapheneOS. Giving into Google hardware to escape Google software is a step I don’t want to take. I’ll take calyxOS or divestOS until then.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        We need hardware requirements so that not just pixel phones can get grapheneOS.

        GOS has strict hardware requirements to increase security that currently only Pixels meet. They won’t, and shouldn’t, compromise their standards which would give you a weaker OS. Want GOS on other vendors? Convince those vendors to up their hardware game.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        My main issue with Pixels is their price, even the Pixel A. They are completely unaffordable new, and only hit below $300 when they barely have any support yet (or are used). I don’t mind using an EOL phome because with short support like on phones it is unavoidable, but that would be after alreafdy overpaying.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Honestly the short 5 year from original release till EOL thing really fucking annoys me, but it’s literally every phone on the market. I’ve looked, it’s impossible to find a phone that doesn’t force you to replace it every few years unless you go to a plain dumb phone that only supports voice calls and maybe basic SMS with no apps. That’s just a nonstarter in this day and age.

          Even alternative Android firmware like GrapheneOS and /e/OS are dependent on the stock firmware releases by the phone manufacturer so when the manufacturer goes EOL and stops releasing updates your alternative installs also are effectively EOL.

          The only solution to this problem I’ve seen that seems like it has a chance is Linux Phone OS, but it still has several problems that make it unusable for most people (biggest one probably being that it provides absolutely terrible battery life).

  • kronarbob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I like /e/OS, but the app lounge bothers me a lot. There is no uninstall button and it is not possible to add Fdroid repos… So I have Fdroid installed in addition to it.

    I do not see an added value as if I had the aurora store installed + Fdroid.

    IMO, the best addition of e/OS compared to lineage is clearly the tracker /ad blocker app.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the greatest hindrance to /e/ is the fact that so few devices are supported. The article lists Fairphone as a supported device but that doesn’t retail in my country. Most Chinese OEMs (that form the bulk in my nation) won’t be supported by it. I have had a Nokia and a Samsung but even those two models are nope. One would need to go with the express purpose of installing alternative OS’s and then purchase supported phones like Pixel probably, if they wanna indulge in this. But normal people aren’t gonna do this. They are going to purchase the phone that fits the price vs performance ratio for them rather than alternative OS criterion.

      • grid11@lemy.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        so few devices are supported >?<

        I don’t agree with that, take a look at this:

        Officially supported devices and the list of unofficial /e/ builds part1 and part2 (those might not be working as good as official builds)