mecfs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1173arrow-down1external-linkWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.commecfs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square29fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down2·2 years agoLet me let you in on a little secret, because the title implies otherwise - wildlife protection was never a priority, and will never become one, to any company under capitalism, but especially to a company like that.
minus-squareNegativeNull@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 years agoWith the Chevron case, we likely won’t see any additional protections coming either.
minus-squareDessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoAnd I’m sure that isn’t the only case either…
minus-squaresunzu@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoThere is always this framing that we are now getting fucked over… Which is disingenuous since peasants are always getting fucked over.
Let me let you in on a little secret, because the title implies otherwise - wildlife protection was never a priority, and will never become one, to any company under capitalism, but especially to a company like that.
With the Chevron case, we likely won’t see any additional protections coming either.
And I’m sure that isn’t the only case either…
There is always this framing that we are now getting fucked over… Which is disingenuous since peasants are always getting fucked over.