As a queer person (agender) with a conservative dad, I don’t get why he says he wants to go back to the 1950s. What was so special back then besides his reasoning that times were simpler? I feel like it would be harder for me then as a queer person.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Most people have an idyllic view of certain childhood years, usually around the ages 5 to 10 or so. It’s before you start to understand just how broken the world is, and your worldview gets more complex and nuanced.

    Many people wrongly assume that the world really was simpler when they were that age. The truth is, the world was just as messed up–they were just blissfully unaware.

    Next time your dad complains, remind him that we still have milkshakes and racism.

    • SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unless you grew up in the '80s. Jesus, what a shitshow. Though I notice a lot of nostalgia for the '80s from people who aren’t old enough to remember it.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agreed on all points, and also would like to point out most of the people who want to “go back” are not the ones who were oppressed during that time. It’s no surprise that the people who want to go back are mostly those who grew up in the white suburbs and small towns, where it was simple and easy.

      The oppressed are conveniently left out of those conversations. Where were the black people, or the gay people during those times? They existed, but in a very simple worldview it’s easy to forget that.

  • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s never about the real past for them. It’s about the fake shallow image of the past they yearn for.

    The 50s, yeah, when ‘howl’ was published and every single adult was on meth qaaludes cocaine and a BAC that would today get you rushed to the ER for just about every waking moment. But thats not what they remember. They get the simplified idealized propaganda version, and like it. Everything is fantasy rp to them.

    Same with the crusades, early america, and everything else they like.

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Personally, I want to go back to the way in the 1950’s had livable wages where people could afford housing, food, and health services. I would also like to go back to an internet before corporations destroyed it with all their AI and tracking.

  • weremacaque@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d only be in it for the ability to buy a house, except that I’d share it with friends instead of getting married and settling down. I’m a bit too demiromantic for that right now.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think people who think the past was better are all white men, and it’s because they didn’t have to think about other people. They want to go back to ignorance.

    He literally says that to you? The 1950s? Have you asked him specifically why? My mom had a great time in the 1950s and no way would she ever have wanted the world to go backwards to that time. She recognized, as she became older, how bad things were for her mom, for black kids (her school was segregated), for so many people.

    The only reason I can imagine wanting to go to the past, is to try to make this future better, but I know better than to fuck with the timeline and can’t imagine I’d be able to do anything about it anyway.

    • Anthony@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      well, for one, i think he said because something to do with white people. the same reason he likes europe. europe is primarily white people, he says, and segregation was still a thing in the 50s.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Europe is primarily white people

        Hah, that’s telling. Just FYI, there’s been generations upon generations of racism and ethnic hatred here in Eastern Europe. I guess we have the advanced racists: the ones who don’t hate you for your skin colour, but who your parents were, religion and primary language.

        I’ll bet that if your dad grew up here in Romania, he’d be complaining about those sneaky Szeklers trying to steal Transylvania and Roma people being subhuman.

        Also, he seems the type to pine for Europe because “We’re all Christian!”. Trust me, you haven’t seen “Christian love” like state religions persecuting people of the wrong sect. Orthodox Christianity is the state religion here, and Protestants of all stripes get treated like heathens.

  • Alaik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I want the economy of the 50s and civil rights for everyone.

    Sadly, it seems like we’re moving the economy further away from the 50s and only bringing civil rights back there…

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There were plenty of local jobs that paid better than jobs today do (adjusted for CoL) and needed less education etc.

      • Alaik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        We both know you know what was meant. Don’t be like a republican. Have a good day.

          • Alaik@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh I know what you meant, exactly. It’s grade school history. It’s also the same take repeated endlessly on internet forums where pedantry and needing to spell out every single facet rule supreme. So I guess I’ll spell it out. “The economy refers to the fact someone was able to pay for a home, family, and yearly vacation on an entry level, high school diploma as the only requirement job. The civil rights and liberties people are stating as the one thing they didn’t want to bring to modern times.”

            I’m going to assume you know why someone would want that without the abuse of minorities, immigrants, or third world countries.

            Or you can just pull the same thing everyone else does and state, “A society like that couldn’t exist without that exploitation.” like the true unique free thinker you are. To which I say prove it. We’ve always had a rich parasite class that needed exploitation, those who are fine without being far wealthier than others are perfectly capable of doing fine without the exploitation, its the leeches that require it.

            • zenforyen@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Ah it’s always the same with those ideologically blinded people.

              Capitalism is inherently bad blah blah

              Socialism can never work blah blah

              It’s all bullshit. Capitalism does not matter, socialism does not matter. How we call it does not matter. What matters is that a society is healthy, sustainable and prospering.

              The main problem of all theories is the confrontation with reality - each set of values or ideology is as much worth as the people who (supposedly) follow it.

              In any system we ever built, there are greedy, corrupt, powerful people, who like shit, always somehow end up swimming at the top. And then everything begins to rot.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                This is just you replacing sound economic analysis with vibes-based idealism, ironically you’re divorcing yourself from reality while claiming others need to see it better. A quick example is that socialism has resulted in far lower inequality while maintaining stable growth than capitalism has, yet you pretend they are the same in disparity. Connect with reality.

              • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Could not agree more. I’m a democratic socialist. I firmly believe that the ideas of that ideology, properly implemented, can drastically improve the standard of living for a huge percentage of the population.

                I live in a country where our democratic socialist party is fantastically corrupt, lazy and completely bereft of any motivation to do anything that doesn’t directly benefit themselves. Consequently, I don’t support them. Results over ideology is an important mantra no matter what you believe.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  All socialism is democratic, “democratic socialism” normally refers to reformist socialism. The corruption, in that case, makes sense, as reformism is usually conceding to the status quo.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The 50s were objectively a time of prosperity and entitlement for the US. It’s literally why they’re called “boomers”, it was an economic boom. We had high taxes on the rich, people saw those tax dollars translate into quality public services like highways, corporate competition was high, education was affordable, housing was plentiful. It was undoubtedly the best time to be a while male in US history.

    And then capitalism did its efficient best to buy up the govt and begin squeezing all that prosperity into their pockets. And here we are.

    • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s literally why they’re called “boomers”, it was an economic boom.

      It’s short for “Baby Boomers”, because there was a huge baby boom after WW2.

          • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just a stupid joke on the tendency people have to try to reconstruct etymology from the top down rather than bottom up, often using tenuous logical connections lol

            Boomers are called that because they were born after the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

            Zoomers are the generation of high speed rail and fast cars

            Gen alpha are all chads due to the hormones used in agriculture

  • pleasestopasking@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have your asked your dad? What does he say? Did you tell him that you think it would be harder for you and ask what his opinion is?

    Not saying you have to, just curious if you did how it went. I’m in a similar boat.