• tranxuanthang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hopefully I don’t get many downvotes for this, but it isns’t necessary to deny anything related to AI and bombard Mozilla for this. Sure, Copilot is a disaster, because it is a service and will call home to M$ and collect your data. But all of what Mozilla offers us is on-device AI, which is exceptional. I’ve been waiting so long for on-device AI-based webpage translation, so people don’t need to rely on external services like Google or Bing to translate any more.

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same, their local translation tech is absolutely great! If they keep working “AI” features that are pretty much quality of life ML stuff I’m all in for it.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s fun playing with local AI stuff. I’ve been playing with piper-tts and it’s fast on a modern system.

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about

    Which one of you was it, who asked for AI in Firefox???

    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      AI actually can be very good at translating things locally while keeping tone and intent, and thats what mozilla mentions here. I’m fully down with AI powered local translation tools native to firefox, it’ll put it way above the competition

      Some LLMs are low enough in resource usage to do this on weak and older PCs

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    “At Mozilla, we work hard to make Firefox the best browser for you. That’s why we’re always focused on building a browser…”

    You don’t need to lie to us. We are just happy you are finally working on browser features.

    I’m looking forward to reducing ui clutter and profile improvements.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The lie is that they are always focused on making the best browser. The last few years they have focused on everything but the browser.

  • Derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Finally, the only two features I’ve been missing - tab groups and profiles. With all the modern internet browser stones, we’ll be unstoppable!

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty please, fuck off with the AI. It’s really not something I need from a browser, don’t inflate your download size for a screen reader, just MAKE IT OPTIONAL in every way.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You sound like you have no disabilities that make it hard for you to use the Internet. Good for you.

      If AI can add usability features that help people use the Internet easier then that’s a good thing. You don’t need to use it. Why complain about software being capable of helping others?

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good luck convincing people to switch to it based only on “it loads pages faster than Chrome” though. It’s a good goal to have, but getting tunnel-visioned on it when their current speed in real world use is pretty comparable is definitely not a good long-term plan.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Soon, Firefox can block ads better than Chrome. Ads are annoying. I see Chrome losing at least a 5% of the market, if not more, to Firefox, just because they’re going to break uBlock Origin, and Firefox isn’t.

      • nieceandtows@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not talking about pulling more people. I’m talking about my issue as an existing and looooong term user of Firefox. I started using a very low end phone recently, and Firefox vs Chrome on it is night and day difference. I don’t notice it on my galaxy phone, but on low end devices it’s torturous.

        • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, you mean FF for Android? Yeah, on that front it really needs a ton of work. On the desktop side things are pretty much fast to a point where in real world use the difference is minimal.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about — in the same way. We’re focused on giving you AI features that solve tangible problems, respect your privacy, and give you real choice.

    We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models — i.e., more private — to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities.

    NO! I don’t want AI in my Firefox. If Mozilla really adds AI, I will consider switching my main browser since Firefox 1 came out.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      AI generated alt-text running locally is actually a fantastic accessibility feature. It’s reliable, it provides a service, it can absolutely be deployed securely.

      It’s fine to be critical of technology, it’s not fine to become as irrational about it as the tech bros trying to make a buck.

    • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just use librewolf or something, or if they incorporate ai, I’d be surprised if an ai-free fork doesn’t pop up quickly

      • tuxec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        +1 for LibreWolf. I’ve been using it for ~2 years and it’s better than Firefox from a privacy perspective. Development is active, so updates are being pushed regularly. As for vertical tabs, you can easily achieve it with Tree Style Tabs. I strongly recommend it.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve looked at alternative forks of Firefox before, but there were two problems for me: a) most are not up to date or slow to update, and b) hard to trust my browser to any community or other company. You see, I actually trust Mozilla, specifically Firefox and Thunderbird. At least the AI is local only, but it would add another attack vector and bloat for no reason to me. We’ll see if it can be disabled.

      • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Plus I think there will be a way to disable it (like with local translation we have rn).

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve heard a lot of people talk about vertical tabs but personally I don’t see the appeal. Can you explain to me what is desirable about vertical tabs?

      • ditty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago
        1. You can have tons of tabs open while still being able to read what they are

        2. Moving the tabs to the side of your browser window frees up more vertical real estate which better matches the webpage layout of most websites, which otherwise have wasted space on the left and right sides of the page when viewing them on a computer

    • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      How is displaying a password in a certain font “broken” when you can easily copy/paste it? People who rally against Firefox sure do point to ridiculous, non-existent “problems” as an excuse to keep using laughable Chromium/derivatives.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The idea is to be able to read the password with your eyeballs, so you can type it into another computer. This fails.

          • solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Hardy har har. I have a saved password on my phone and I want to use it on my laptop. This happens now and then but not often enough to want to introduce another software dependency and its security problems. It’s a password (randomly generated, but still), not War And Peace. Simple enough-- read it off the phone and type it into the laptop, but no. They used a font that makes some characters indistinguishable, there is a 2 year old open ticket to fix it, and you sit there making wisecracks. Found the issue:

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_justification

            • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              So copy and paste it into something else on your computer if you’re too blind to see the difference in letters in that font (I can tell, easily) and tell it to use another font. PEBCAK issue, not a real one.

              • solrize@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                This is on my phone (Android Firefox), not the computer (desktop Firefox). Yes some of the characters in the font are indistinguishable. That’s why there’s a ticket open after all. And even if crappy workarounds exist, it can and does still suck. Thus, JMINS.

                Why do you defend this crap? I never understand what makes people do that.

                • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  “FIREFOX SUX BECAUSE MY OUTSIDER 0.00000001% USE CASE AND I OPENED A TICKET BOOHOO!”

                  This is how you sound. Just because there’s a ticket open for outlier bullshit doesn’t make it valid to gripe about endlessly, especially when there are so many possible, simple ways around it. Slightly annoying does not mean broken.

                  Phones have copy/paste, by the way.

    • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This has actually been the most positive reaction to a Firefox announcement I’ve seen in a long time. I’ve yet to find a piece of open source software users act more toxic towards than Firefox. It is impossible to find any Firefox-related announcement in recent years that’s received broadly positive feedback. For a long time, the top voted comment would always be someone demanding tab groups or vertical tabs. Now they’re adding those, which is probably why the reaction has been a bit more positive. But of course, AI and UI changes have become the new things to complain about.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The top comment is usually someone saying nothing should ever change and every feature is bloat and should be an extension.

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Backdrop-filter blur with css animations and box-shadows. Lots of flickering, weird artifacts.

        It’s also got an issue on macOS where a sticky element can’t have a backdrop-filter with a background that has alpha/opacity (#0006)

        CSS transitions are laggy in general in FF Linux

        Works in chrome and safari and FF on windows.