stephen01king

Dang, they’ve really been preparing for this for a while, haven’t they. A lot more than I can say for the Trump administration.

In this specific conflict, one of them was not the aggressor, so I am still on their side within that specific context. They’re still a horrible regime, though.

Probably having thousands of Chrome tabs open.

Same energy as “if you don’t want to be poor, be rich”.

We’re asking what YOU define as communism.

Unfortunately they don’t explain what the attacks were in the article. Gonna need to find the paper to know.

I mean, I can definitely feel my brain function deteriorating by the minute.

I did the same thing. In my defence, I am really really sleepy right now.

I don’t know what you’re even arguing. Your analogy breaks down because in this case, we can’t even see if the raven is black or not. No one can theoretically prove consciousness. The rest of your comments seems to be arguing that current AI has no consciousness, which is exactly what I said, so I guess this is just an attempt at supporting my point?

Everything you said is right, but you’re only proving that LLM weights is a severely simplified version of neurons. It neither disproves that they don’t have consciousness or that being a mathematical model precludes it from having consciousness at all.

In my opinion, the current models doesn’t express any consciousness, but I am against saying they don’t because they are a mathematical model rather than by the results we can measure. The fact that we can’t theoretically prove consciousness in the human brain also means we can’t theoretically disprove consciousness in an LLM model. They aren’t conscious because they haven’t expressed enough to be considered conscious, and that’s the extent we should claim to know.

Okay, now explain how the human neuron expresses consciousness.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 10 metre banana.

I think he made a point that the date might be auto populated and one who generated it didn’t notice or forgot about it.

Huh, you’re right. I missed that.

But what made you conclude he needed to do that? There was no indication his child ordered anything without his consent.

But you’ll have a cool anecdote to tell people for the rest of your life.

You certainly aren’t. Not unless you know the guy personally and familiar with his circumstances. Without that knowledge, you are being judgemental.

Man, you’re very judgemental, aren’t you?

Don’t you mean $100 a day?

And?