Do they look like equivalent questions to you?

A source might give evidence for something that happened in the real world, while these last questions were about what goes on in that silly head of yours.

Lol I finally ask something you’re qualified to answer and suddenly you have no opinion.

Well, it’s true that this is very simple. I wanted the poster’s source – if there is one. Unless you’re claiming to be them, you don’t have that information.

But since you seem very interested, do you personally think the CCP death estimate you keep presenting is accurate?

You say the commenter above was wrong, but your tone suggests you still agree with them. Do you believe the rest of their narrative that student protestors were peacefully dispersed in song by the unarmed army choir?

Do you recognize that CPC has a conflict of interest in providing accurate information about this, and that they continue to censor information about it to this day?

So just to clarify, you think that:

1.) you can provide the correct source for another person’s statement

2.) what you posted qualifies as a source even though you did not give one

3.) it’s OK if the statement does not agree with the source

4.) you can justify your misattribution by cherry-picking a number that “roughly” agrees if you massage it

Bruh.

IDK why you’re trying to source someone else’s comment for them, but if you read the comment and the wiki you would see that they are not in agreement.

This is why I asked for their source. Sorry if you find that offensive for some reason lol

Since we’re evidently reading the same Wikipedia article, I’ll point out that those are among the lowest estimates on the page and the Beijing hospital record was 478 dead and 920 wounded.

But these are all very different numbers from what was commented.

Do you have a source for your estimate of deaths? 100+ is very ambiguous since it includes any number >100, which seems already beyond contention.

These are actually separate issues. TPB isn’t legally responsible for theft if someone leaks an unreleased song. But, the publishing company can sue them for damages related to lost income based on TPB’s distribution of content.

Are platforms responsible for the content their users post? No. Rules for unusual situations (CSAM, terrorism, copyright, etc) have been established for probably decades by this point.

An online chat/message board is not comparable to an image generator because the company is not creating potentially harmful content.

Honestly I’m just amused that the photo is the part that’s not plausible

Oh damn, probably I could have claimed that then. Thanks for the tip!

Yeah, just out of warranty unfortunately

65" Hisense TV. Bought it new and 1.5 years later the motherboard died. Scoured the Internet for the part and it turned out Hisense didn’t even sell it, you had to buy secondhand used boards.

But it must have been a common problem b/c over ~6 months even the resellers were permanently sold out. Recycled it in the original packaging.

IMO companies like that should be forced to recycle every scrap of their e-waste themselves.

Ironic to warn about bread lines when many people are waiting in lines at food banks already under the current administration

I mean he tried. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Mountain_Peace_and_Justice_Party

He was also regarded as independent for many years.

Well, democrats are asking to extend current discounted health insurance costs for everyone and republicans implemented massive tax cuts that gave the top 5% of earners 3-4x the tax benefit compared to the lower 40% Link.

So no, the parties actually take substantially different views on the so-called owner class.

Actually votes already are even under the current system

I think this question could be interpreted in many ways, but typically education is correlated with more religious participation.

For Mennonites specifically, education is one of their core values. They also did a study on what matters most to their members that you can check if you’re interested: https://www.mennoniteusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/MC-USA-Report-FN-compressed-1.pdf

Personally, I think a lot of their belief system and activism efforts just make sense and appeal based on their own merits.

There are many kinds of Mennonites. Most that I know are pretty scientific and well-educated.

At least in the US, tipping is the accepted way that we compensate certain people for their time.

If you habitually never tip, you are not paying for the service that you receive in good faith. This is theft of service.

If you don’t like tipping, patronize places that include the tip in the bill. Tell restaurant owners to change their pay structure to avoid it. It won’t be changed by you individually shirking your obligation to pay.