

why don’t they focus on fixing their cold soggy fries and shit-tier “burgers” first


why don’t they focus on fixing their cold soggy fries and shit-tier “burgers” first


why do they keep calling their concentration camps “detention facility”–
they’re fucking concentration camps


jesus fucking christ


GOP: “it was just locker room talk!!!”


when i was a kid, it was normal for parents to say “get out of my sight” and we would just go outside and meet up with our friends. we knew it was time to go home when the street lights turned on. but then there were the kids whose parents wouldn’t let them go out to play with their friends. so they had no friends.
yea, you can force your kids into a bubble where they can’t even talk to their peers, sure. that’s a great way to have kids who never call you when they grow up


yea, “at-will workplace” sold as beneficial to employees who already could quit a job any time for any reason, but in actuality protects companies who fire their employees for bullshit illegal reasons


once again the party of “protect the children” are the ones raping children


the fucked up thing is the number of people who actually thought it was ever about “dogs”


edward snowden pretty much spilled the beans on government mass surveillance many years ago, but most people just said “meh…whatever”


why is “gay republican” there?
it’s evidence of how GOP’s constant vicious attacks on the LGBTQ is just pandering to the uneducated bigoted evangelical morons who already hated gays. not that it makes any difference to maga. so far it seems like the only thing that has started to make blindly loyal maga cult sheeple question dear leader and his entire circle has been the child rape coverup. and even that, just fucking barely


go through and edit your comments to be gibberish before you delete your acccount


when are they rolling that shit out on AI-slop-CSAM-central aka twitter?


ok.
but here’s a better headline that doesn’t paint stephen colbert as the sole entitiy “accusing” someone of doing a thing that the someone literally did


imagine wrecking your life working to advance a thing for which the ultimate end goal is to replace you entirely


is it really a case of one person “accusing” someone of something, when the thing is literally what happened?


they ran the test on those pw managers because they were open source. that allowed the testers to implement a “dummy” provider on their own “compromised server.” so the results of failing the tests are based on the hypothetical situation of “what if bitwarden (or whoever) had an entire server taken over by hackers”. while the chances of that happening are greater than zero, it would take a lot for someone to completely hijack a server like that
edit to add-- these tests are one of the reasons these pw managers choose to be open source: to allow 3rd party tests like this to find vulnerabilities, so they can be fixed
nothing is 100% guaranteed safe, but if you don’t want to remember or write down dozens or hundreds of unique strong passwords, i still would recommend a pw manager


it’s not just firefox. pretty sure that’s just how the web works. i use librewolf with privacy badger, canvas blocker, and ublock, but it’s still built around firefox. i get a “unique fingerprint” notification, but also “you have strong tracking protection”


i think the message is there’s no such thing as 100% private/anonymous–there’ll always be something giving you up


i think it’s pretty safe to assume that anything any of them says is a fucking outright lie
ok, noted.
they’re fucking concentration camps