
Sorting my feed by top for not having used Lemmy in a while
But it did go mainstream enough. It created a user split, and Claude went from niche and for developers to pretty much generally used.
A proudly fat italian. Extremely nerdy. Adamantly fat positive.
cis he/him, 23

Sorting my feed by top for not having used Lemmy in a while
But it did go mainstream enough. It created a user split, and Claude went from niche and for developers to pretty much generally used.

Food tampering can absolutely kill someone, and it did. This is not the case of someone trying to pass petty items at a Walmart.

Food tampering is minor now

It is working fine to me. Are you behind a good web browser and ad blocker?

That has been Vance too outside of the US.

You mean the website of your instance? You can use LeechblockNG (https://github.com/proginosko/LeechBlockNG, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/leechblock-ng/)
If your GrapheneOS build still includes Digital Wellbeing, you can use that to limit daily usage of specific apps. It is found in the system settings.

They are not, come on now.
Retro networking is a different community, and all is still done behind a modern router. They are a subset of the retro computing community, but they don’t run such systems as their daily driver.
Most of the legacy OS enthusiasts running on as their daily driver are not interested in matching their networking to be period correct, they just want it to work well and quickly like everybody else. For that you need basic modern equipment, that is often included into ISP plans.

That’s not how it works, especially since everyone doing this is behind a modern router.
Nothing will happen if you have a Windows 98 computer connected to the internet when the home internet router is on default settings. And modern internet browsers implement security in themselves on systems they still support.
Firefox still supports Windows 7 via the ESR channel, and every new install gets redirected to on automatically on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1.
Worry the unsupported systems behind pure internet or providing public internet services, or the users installing the free PDF editor Google advertised as first in search. Those are many more than older Windows enthusiasts.

Nobody really gives a damn about the Saudi Pro League, and that matters a lot

Genuinely what I wished for when the Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 was announced as “The First AI Phone”.
Instead what was shown in the livestream was literally Gemini, a product of another company on a €2000 smartphone that doesn’t even use the hardware you pay for.

It instead is 100% to repeat what Elon wants you to believe

I am not even from the US. The only reason I follow US politics is because my country’s politics love suckling the toes of the POTUS without fail no matter what they do or who is in charge.
What seems to be here is more you being radicalised. It can be for good reasons and I am not in your mind, but nobody is going to agree with you no matter who they are.


The “one less olive” theory gets proven time and time again

“both-sides” crack

You are talking more about the term here being used everywhere out of context.

I definitely think that was such a major blunder, but also it was probably done to make it a struggle to compete for smaller or starting companies.

Investment is done really to train models for ever more miniscule gains. I feel like the current choices are enough to satisfy who is interested in such services, and what really is lacking is now more hardware dedicated to single user sessions to improve quality of output with the current models.
But I really want to see more development on offline services, as right now it is really done only by hobbyists and only occasionally large companies with a little dripfeed (Facebook Llama, original Deepseek model [latter being pretty much useless as no one has the hardware to run it]).
I remember seeing the Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (“the first AI phone”, unironic cit.) presentation and listening to them talking about all the AI features instead of the real phone capabilities. “All of this is offline, right? A powerful smartphone… makes sense to have local models for tasks.” but it later became abundantly clear it was just repackaged always-online Gemini for the entire presentation on $2000 of hardware.

The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help.
The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news.
I think you crossposted in the wrong community